Hello dear reader, the blog you have come to enjoy is no longer here. As of today Tongues in Jars will continue over at WordPress. I'm making the move to take advantage of WordPress' various features, and because it's a more powerful community platform.
That's not to say that Blogger hasn't been good to me. It's hosted this blog from its beginning and given me a place to put my writing. Without that people like you would never have read any of it. And, because of you this blog has had over 5,000 views. Thanks!
Also, Tongues in Jars will be continuing on WordPress under a new name!
Because I'm not likely to get back to translating Latin texts in the foreseeable future, I've decided to put the focus entirely on Beowulf. As such, this new WordPress blog is called A Blogger's Beowulf. The blog's new address is http://bloggersbeowulf.wordpress.com.
Now. For the foreseeable future, this blog will continue to exist on Blogger. However, it will only be an archive of past entries. For everything new (and old) for A Blogger's Beowulf, come check out
Wes hál!
-Nicholas
Saturday, June 7, 2014
Thursday, June 5, 2014
On mythical smiths and plundered gear (ll.399-406) [Old English]
Abstract
Translation
Recordings
Vague words and allusions
Plundered gear
Closing
Back To Top
Abstract
Wulfgar having given him the okay, Beowulf strides in to Hrothgar with his thanes in tow.
Back To Top
Translation
"Arose then the hero, from amidst his many thanes,
various valiant warriors, some remained there,
to watch the war-gear, as they were strictly ordered.
They hurried together, their chief going first,
under Heorot's roof; on went the war-fierce,
under hard helmets, until they stood upon the hearth.
Beowulf spoke - on him the byrnie shone,
his corslet crafted with the smith's skill:"
(Beowulf ll.399-406)
Back To Top
Recordings
Old English:
{Forthcoming}
Modern English:
{Forthcoming}
Back To Top
Vague words and allusions
Although the poet/scribe here describes Beowulf's walking "under Heorot's roof" ("under Heorotes hrof" (l.403)) we're no closer to figuring out whether he and his fellow Geats have been waiting outside or in some sort of antechamber. Even the Old English is of no help since it literally means "under Heorot's roof." Either Beowulf has walked in to be under it, or is striding (no doubt manfully) beneath Heorot's golden eaves.
Though really, what sort of hall could be called "great" without some sort of antechamber?
Moving from one vague phrase to another, at the end of this passage we encounter "smiþes."
This word translates easily into "smith," but the question is: is it plural or singular?
A quick look at the University of Virginia's famed Magic Sheet reveals that "smiþes" is in fact singular.
So what?
It's possible that this word is an allusion. In Norse myth there is a famous smith named Wayland who crafted many wondrous things (like the incredible, instantly-travelling "Wade's boat" referenced in Chaucer's "The Merchant's Tale"). Normally it would be ridiculous to pick this reference out of a throwaway use of the word "smiþes." But the end of this passage is special.
After we're told that Beowulf speaks, the poet/scribe decides to go on and describe the armour that Beowulf is wearing.
We're told that Beowulf's byrnie (waist-length maille shirt) shone and that his corslet (breastplate) was made "with the smith's skill" (l.406). All of this talk of armour, however brief, opens up the possibility of "smiþes" being a reference to Wayland. This description being the set up for Beowulf's speech also suggests a reference because reading even the first line of the Geat's gab shows that it is a formal, carefully worded address. It's not every day (even during the lifetime of the poet/scribe) that you use "þu," ("thou") after all.
Now, if "smiþes" is a reference to Wayland, it doesn't necessarily mean that Wayland made Beowulf's armour. Though that would fit in well with why Beowulf (not to mention the poet/scribe) prizes it so highly. It could just be a reference that is idiomatic in that the real live smith who fashioned the Geat's battle gear seemed to have channelled the mythical skill of the smith when making it. It's just that good.
Mythological reference or not, as we'll see soon, whoever the smith was that made Beowulf's armour, he made it to last.
Back To Top
Plundered gear
Along with a bizarre, translation-blocking typo in the Old English text of the bilingual edition of Heaney's translation (the apparently non-existent "pryðlic" for "þryðlic" (l.400)), this passage has a word of note.
Yet another word for "war-gear," "heaðo-reaf," has a curious meaning when pulled apart and patched back together.
Separately, its words translate as "war" and "plunder, booty, spoil; garment, armour, vestment." These don't exactly come together like "Wig/laf" (literally "war legacy/relic"), there's a definite implication that this armour is directly related to combat. Beowulf has pulled it from the battle field.
But in what sense?
Could it simply refer to its being plundered from a battlefield?
Or should the reference be taken to mean that it's seen many close scrapes and yet been "plundered" from each one in that its wearer has survived to wear it again?
Either way, it's not used here to avoid some sort of reference to genitalia, but instead, to simply alliterate in the first half of the line.
Back To Top
Closing
Next week, Beowulf to Hrothgar speaks.
Back To Top
Translation
Recordings
Vague words and allusions
Plundered gear
Closing
Back To Top
Abstract
Wulfgar having given him the okay, Beowulf strides in to Hrothgar with his thanes in tow.
Back To Top
Translation
"Arose then the hero, from amidst his many thanes,
various valiant warriors, some remained there,
to watch the war-gear, as they were strictly ordered.
They hurried together, their chief going first,
under Heorot's roof; on went the war-fierce,
under hard helmets, until they stood upon the hearth.
Beowulf spoke - on him the byrnie shone,
his corslet crafted with the smith's skill:"
(Beowulf ll.399-406)
Back To Top
Recordings
Old English:
{Forthcoming}
Modern English:
{Forthcoming}
Back To Top
Vague words and allusions
Although the poet/scribe here describes Beowulf's walking "under Heorot's roof" ("under Heorotes hrof" (l.403)) we're no closer to figuring out whether he and his fellow Geats have been waiting outside or in some sort of antechamber. Even the Old English is of no help since it literally means "under Heorot's roof." Either Beowulf has walked in to be under it, or is striding (no doubt manfully) beneath Heorot's golden eaves.
Though really, what sort of hall could be called "great" without some sort of antechamber?
Moving from one vague phrase to another, at the end of this passage we encounter "smiþes."
This word translates easily into "smith," but the question is: is it plural or singular?
A quick look at the University of Virginia's famed Magic Sheet reveals that "smiþes" is in fact singular.
So what?
It's possible that this word is an allusion. In Norse myth there is a famous smith named Wayland who crafted many wondrous things (like the incredible, instantly-travelling "Wade's boat" referenced in Chaucer's "The Merchant's Tale"). Normally it would be ridiculous to pick this reference out of a throwaway use of the word "smiþes." But the end of this passage is special.
After we're told that Beowulf speaks, the poet/scribe decides to go on and describe the armour that Beowulf is wearing.
We're told that Beowulf's byrnie (waist-length maille shirt) shone and that his corslet (breastplate) was made "with the smith's skill" (l.406). All of this talk of armour, however brief, opens up the possibility of "smiþes" being a reference to Wayland. This description being the set up for Beowulf's speech also suggests a reference because reading even the first line of the Geat's gab shows that it is a formal, carefully worded address. It's not every day (even during the lifetime of the poet/scribe) that you use "þu," ("thou") after all.
Now, if "smiþes" is a reference to Wayland, it doesn't necessarily mean that Wayland made Beowulf's armour. Though that would fit in well with why Beowulf (not to mention the poet/scribe) prizes it so highly. It could just be a reference that is idiomatic in that the real live smith who fashioned the Geat's battle gear seemed to have channelled the mythical skill of the smith when making it. It's just that good.
Mythological reference or not, as we'll see soon, whoever the smith was that made Beowulf's armour, he made it to last.
Back To Top
Plundered gear
Along with a bizarre, translation-blocking typo in the Old English text of the bilingual edition of Heaney's translation (the apparently non-existent "pryðlic" for "þryðlic" (l.400)), this passage has a word of note.
Yet another word for "war-gear," "heaðo-reaf," has a curious meaning when pulled apart and patched back together.
Separately, its words translate as "war" and "plunder, booty, spoil; garment, armour, vestment." These don't exactly come together like "Wig/laf" (literally "war legacy/relic"), there's a definite implication that this armour is directly related to combat. Beowulf has pulled it from the battle field.
But in what sense?
Could it simply refer to its being plundered from a battlefield?
Or should the reference be taken to mean that it's seen many close scrapes and yet been "plundered" from each one in that its wearer has survived to wear it again?
Either way, it's not used here to avoid some sort of reference to genitalia, but instead, to simply alliterate in the first half of the line.
Back To Top
Closing
Next week, Beowulf to Hrothgar speaks.
Back To Top
Thursday, May 29, 2014
Beowulf's placement and Wulfgar's use of "you" (ll.389b-398) [Old English]
Abstract
Translation
Recordings
Are they in or out?
Oh, "eow"...
Closing
Back To Top
Abstract
Wulfgar runs to Beowulf and the Geats, bearing word of their being accepted by Hrothgar.
Back To Top
Translation
"Then to the hall door
went Wulfgar, from within this word was called out:
'You as commanded by word of my war lord,
prince of the East-Danes, that he knows of your family:
and you to him are from over the sea-wave,
proven brave, welcome hither.
Now you may go in wearing your armour,
under your helmets, to see Hrothgar;
yet here unbind and leave your shields,
broad boards, and deadly spears, this is a meeting for words alone'"
(Beowulf ll.389b-398)
Back To Top
Recordings
Old English:
{Forthcoming}
Modern English:
{Forthcoming}
Back To Top
Are they in or out?
This scene reminds me of Dorothy's arrival at the Emerald City in The Wizard of Oz. I can very vividly picture Wulfgar popping his head out of a window cut into Heorot's door and calling down to Beowulf that he and his Geats are allowed in.
The trouble with that is that they've already taken seats at benches. So are those benches outside on Heorot's lawn (perhaps the setting for a now lost epic poem about lawn bowling) or are they in some sort of antechamber?
We are told, when the Geats arrive, that they lean some of their gear up against a wall ("sea-weary they set their shields aside,/battle-hard bucklers, against that hall's wall;" ("setton sæmeþe side scyldas,/rondas regnhearde, wið þæs recedes weal," (ll.325-326))). The benches (the exact word used is "bence" (l.327)) that they sit on are also vague. In the former case it seems as though they're outside and have set their weapons up against the hall's outer wall. The non-descript benches could also be outside (the word used isn't "medu-benc" ("bench in a meadhall") after all).
But then what can be taken from Wulfgar's mentioning the conditions of their meeting with Hrothgar; namely that they are to leave their shields and spears outside?
Doing so could be an act of trust. It might be a way for the Danes to tell if the Geats are with honour and honesty. If they're willing to leave the tools of their trade in the open, it shows that they see the Danes as no threat to their gear and that they believe that their equipment will be well kept for them.
If the Geats are still outside it definitely explains why the poet/scribe hasn't said more about the Danes' reaction to them. They are still new arrivals in this land and do not yet have the ability to freely enter and exit it. In effect, they need to leave part of themselves outside in order to gain access.
Though that does leave them with their swords.
But, as poetic as this all is, I can' help but thiwael-sceaftasnk that the Geats are free to bring in their swords because these items are more status symbol than weapon.
Claiming to be someone's son could only go so far, carrying your father's sword would confirm your lineage. Along with whatever family resemblance there might be of course.
Not to mention, swords seem to have a much richer life as the weapon for single combats and particularly tough spots in battles. The compound for "spear" that appears on line 398 suggests that that weapon is much more regarded as the brutal tool of human destruction. The word "wælsceaftas" literally translates as "slaughter/carnage spear," leaving little doubt as to their efficacy in mass combat.
Unless, behind all of this praise of spears, is a particularly boastful poet/scribe who thinks that the Danes and Geats were terrible swordsmen.
Back To Top
Oh, "eow"...
English has never been a tonal language. The difference between Old English and even Middle English (what Chaucer and Gower wrote in) is wide since the former is a synthetic language and the latter is much more of an analytic language, but even so. English has always been English.
Though, curiously, Old English seems to have more context-sensitive words.
The first word in Wulfgar's speech, for example, is "eow."
Seamus Heaney translated this as "my lord" and Francis Gummere translated the word simply as "to you" (l.391). From the original it's clear that Wulfgar is addressing Beowulf directly. But even if he is a stranger, it seems as though more formality should be applied than that contained in "eow." A nice "ðu" (modernized as "thou") would be better suited.
Unless Wulfgar, in conveying Hrothgar's message of extreme welcome, is dialling it back a bit because he's wary of this fierce band claiming to be from Geatland.
As Hrothgar's herald Wulfgar has no doubt seen his share of warriors coming to them with hopes of ridding Heorot of Grendel only to have those hopes plucked from them like legs from a spider. And maybe Wulfgar's sick of seeing the flower of youth trampled in this way. All of the men of courage are throwing themselves at a problem with no clear solution and leaving the world filled with layabout rogues.
Of course, even for someone with a master's degree in English, that's a lot to pull out of a single "eow." Wulfgar could also just be adjusting his address to something more casual because Beowulf and his fellow Geats are entering the Danish social hierarchy with a reputation for courage but no first-hand proof of it. "Eow" is thus used because the Geats have yet to become worthy of the daintier "ðu."
Back To Top
Closing
Next week Beowulf and a select few of the Geats crowd into Hrothgar's hall.
Back To Top
Translation
Recordings
Are they in or out?
Oh, "eow"...
Closing
Back To Top
Abstract
Wulfgar runs to Beowulf and the Geats, bearing word of their being accepted by Hrothgar.
Back To Top
Translation
"Then to the hall door
went Wulfgar, from within this word was called out:
'You as commanded by word of my war lord,
prince of the East-Danes, that he knows of your family:
and you to him are from over the sea-wave,
proven brave, welcome hither.
Now you may go in wearing your armour,
under your helmets, to see Hrothgar;
yet here unbind and leave your shields,
broad boards, and deadly spears, this is a meeting for words alone'"
(Beowulf ll.389b-398)
Back To Top
Recordings
Old English:
{Forthcoming}
Modern English:
{Forthcoming}
Back To Top
Are they in or out?
This scene reminds me of Dorothy's arrival at the Emerald City in The Wizard of Oz. I can very vividly picture Wulfgar popping his head out of a window cut into Heorot's door and calling down to Beowulf that he and his Geats are allowed in.
The trouble with that is that they've already taken seats at benches. So are those benches outside on Heorot's lawn (perhaps the setting for a now lost epic poem about lawn bowling) or are they in some sort of antechamber?
We are told, when the Geats arrive, that they lean some of their gear up against a wall ("sea-weary they set their shields aside,/battle-hard bucklers, against that hall's wall;" ("setton sæmeþe side scyldas,/rondas regnhearde, wið þæs recedes weal," (ll.325-326))). The benches (the exact word used is "bence" (l.327)) that they sit on are also vague. In the former case it seems as though they're outside and have set their weapons up against the hall's outer wall. The non-descript benches could also be outside (the word used isn't "medu-benc" ("bench in a meadhall") after all).
But then what can be taken from Wulfgar's mentioning the conditions of their meeting with Hrothgar; namely that they are to leave their shields and spears outside?
Doing so could be an act of trust. It might be a way for the Danes to tell if the Geats are with honour and honesty. If they're willing to leave the tools of their trade in the open, it shows that they see the Danes as no threat to their gear and that they believe that their equipment will be well kept for them.
If the Geats are still outside it definitely explains why the poet/scribe hasn't said more about the Danes' reaction to them. They are still new arrivals in this land and do not yet have the ability to freely enter and exit it. In effect, they need to leave part of themselves outside in order to gain access.
Though that does leave them with their swords.
But, as poetic as this all is, I can' help but thiwael-sceaftasnk that the Geats are free to bring in their swords because these items are more status symbol than weapon.
Claiming to be someone's son could only go so far, carrying your father's sword would confirm your lineage. Along with whatever family resemblance there might be of course.
Not to mention, swords seem to have a much richer life as the weapon for single combats and particularly tough spots in battles. The compound for "spear" that appears on line 398 suggests that that weapon is much more regarded as the brutal tool of human destruction. The word "wælsceaftas" literally translates as "slaughter/carnage spear," leaving little doubt as to their efficacy in mass combat.
Unless, behind all of this praise of spears, is a particularly boastful poet/scribe who thinks that the Danes and Geats were terrible swordsmen.
Back To Top
Oh, "eow"...
English has never been a tonal language. The difference between Old English and even Middle English (what Chaucer and Gower wrote in) is wide since the former is a synthetic language and the latter is much more of an analytic language, but even so. English has always been English.
Though, curiously, Old English seems to have more context-sensitive words.
The first word in Wulfgar's speech, for example, is "eow."
Seamus Heaney translated this as "my lord" and Francis Gummere translated the word simply as "to you" (l.391). From the original it's clear that Wulfgar is addressing Beowulf directly. But even if he is a stranger, it seems as though more formality should be applied than that contained in "eow." A nice "ðu" (modernized as "thou") would be better suited.
Unless Wulfgar, in conveying Hrothgar's message of extreme welcome, is dialling it back a bit because he's wary of this fierce band claiming to be from Geatland.
As Hrothgar's herald Wulfgar has no doubt seen his share of warriors coming to them with hopes of ridding Heorot of Grendel only to have those hopes plucked from them like legs from a spider. And maybe Wulfgar's sick of seeing the flower of youth trampled in this way. All of the men of courage are throwing themselves at a problem with no clear solution and leaving the world filled with layabout rogues.
Of course, even for someone with a master's degree in English, that's a lot to pull out of a single "eow." Wulfgar could also just be adjusting his address to something more casual because Beowulf and his fellow Geats are entering the Danish social hierarchy with a reputation for courage but no first-hand proof of it. "Eow" is thus used because the Geats have yet to become worthy of the daintier "ðu."
Back To Top
Closing
Next week Beowulf and a select few of the Geats crowd into Hrothgar's hall.
Back To Top
Thursday, May 22, 2014
On Danish welcomes and curious compounds (ll.381b-389a) [Old English]
Abstract
Translation
Recordings
Danish welcomes
The case of the curious compounds
Closing
Back To Top
Abstract
Hrothgar finishes his command to Wulfgar, imploring him to make sure the Geats know that they're welcome.
Back To Top
Translation
"'He holy god
for our support has sent
to the West-Danes, this I believe,
against Grendel's terror. I shall well reward
them with treasures for his courage.
Be thou in haste, go with this command,'"
that the peaceful host may hear it together.
Also give him word that they are welcome
in these Danish lands!'"
(Beowulf ll.381b-389a)
Back To Top
Recordings
Old English:
{Forthcoming}
Modern English:
{Forthcoming}
Back To Top
Danish welcomes
Hrothgar very clearly wishes to greet the Geats with glee. From his abbreviation of what he will reward Beowulf and the Geats for down to simply "his courage," that much is clear. Hrothgar's speech continues to be dusty (though I've done some modernizing with his syntax), but the energy in his speech nonetheless comes through. His line of thinking can even be seen.
It looks like it runs thusly:
Beowulf is rumoured to have the strength of thirty men in his grip and is famed in war (from last week's translation and commentary). He is god-sent, and has courage, therefore he cannot fail and will be rewarded. Not to mention, we can prepare him for his fight with Grendel with a warm welcome.
But what if Hrothgar was not so inclined to the Geats? What if he had never heard of Beowulf, nor of his father? How does the Danish lord deal with those whom he believes to have no chance against Grendel?
Based on his imploring Wulfgar to make sure that the Geats know "that they are welcome/in these Danish lands!" ("þæt hie sint wilcuman/Deniga leodum." (ll.388-389a) (which sounds almost as if he's asking Wulfgar to communicate this welcome in every word), a cold reception would entail a cold welcome.
That sounds obvious enough.
But would that mean an ejection from the hall? An outright attack? The Geats have come quite heavily armed, after all. Such a violent reception could be expected. Though the Geats did respect whatever etiquette exists in putting their spears and shields to the side of the door when they came in. Swords may have been worn as a last line of defense, or as a mark of nobility, though, and so be perfectly allowed even in a hall. Or maybe the Geats didn't want to drop their guard entirely. We aren't exactly told that all of the Danes in the hall are wearing swords (or if any are, for that matter).
So a hostile reply would likely be a formal request to leave the hall and return whence they came.
In point of fact, aside from Wulfgar's being told to warmly welcome them and that they'll eventually be rewarded for their courage, we're not really told what a warm Danish welcome entails. Is this the poet/scribe using some telling to set up a bunch of showing?
Back To Top
The case of the curious compounds
Old English compound words are usually very straightforward. There's some phenomenon or item that is more specific than the usual words for it have connotation to cover and so two words are combined. For example, there's "sorg" for sorrow, and then there's "modsorg" for the more intense "heart-sorrow."
Such compounds make sense because they are the sum of their parts.
But in this week's passage there are two compound words that are more than the sum of their parts.
The word "arstæfum" is Old English for "support," "assistance," "kindness," "benefit," or "grace." It is made up of "ar" ("servant," "messenger," "herald," "apostle," "angel") and "stæfum" ((singular, stæf) "staff," "stick," "rod;" "pastoral staff;" "letter," "character," "writing;" "document;" "letters," "literature," "learning"). Maybe to Anglo-Saxon minds the herald or apostle of writing, literature, or learning are a support or a benefit, but I'm willing to bet that to most modern minds that connection isn't as immediately made as "mod" and "sorg" being "heart-sorrow."
Nonetheless, there is the religious and poetic combination of "benefit" (or "grace") and "pastoral staff" which sounds like just what Hrothgar is talking about when he states his belief that Beowulf has been sent by god. So perhaps this word isn't as literal a compound word as most others, but instead results from the combination of the senses of its two parts.
A similar case could be made for "mod-þræce" meaning "courage."
This word is a combination of "mod" ("heart," "mind," "spirit," "mood," "temper;" "arrogance," "pride," "power;" "violence") and "þræce" ("throng," "pressure," "fury," "storm," "violence," "onrush," "attack"). With such individual meanings combining it's hard to see how these two words combine into one that means "courage." Especially since modern everyday courage could be described as a "violence of the spirit," but generally doesn't happen in violent circumstances. As such, this compound sheds some light on the world from which it comes. Courage then may have included standing up to a bully as it does now, but then the follow through was much more likely to be a violent clash of one sort or another.
Though, that's just one interpretation.
It's also possible that combining such words to mean courage is meant to add a slightly negative connotation to the word. Perhaps "mod-þræce" isn't intended to refer to a clean and tidy courage, but something more akin to the boldness of a berserk state. A kind of controlled fury. Something that even the poem's early audiences well knew was dangerous, but that was also contained and controlled - for the most part.
Anyone with the strength of thirty men in his grip must have been considered at least a little bit monstrous even then after all.
Back To Top
Closing
Next week, Wulfgar rushes back to the Geats to relay Hrothgar's message.
Back To Top
Translation
Recordings
Danish welcomes
The case of the curious compounds
Closing
Back To Top
Abstract
Hrothgar finishes his command to Wulfgar, imploring him to make sure the Geats know that they're welcome.
Back To Top
Translation
"'He holy god
for our support has sent
to the West-Danes, this I believe,
against Grendel's terror. I shall well reward
them with treasures for his courage.
Be thou in haste, go with this command,'"
that the peaceful host may hear it together.
Also give him word that they are welcome
in these Danish lands!'"
(Beowulf ll.381b-389a)
Back To Top
Recordings
Old English:
{Forthcoming}
Modern English:
{Forthcoming}
Back To Top
Danish welcomes
Hrothgar very clearly wishes to greet the Geats with glee. From his abbreviation of what he will reward Beowulf and the Geats for down to simply "his courage," that much is clear. Hrothgar's speech continues to be dusty (though I've done some modernizing with his syntax), but the energy in his speech nonetheless comes through. His line of thinking can even be seen.
It looks like it runs thusly:
Beowulf is rumoured to have the strength of thirty men in his grip and is famed in war (from last week's translation and commentary). He is god-sent, and has courage, therefore he cannot fail and will be rewarded. Not to mention, we can prepare him for his fight with Grendel with a warm welcome.
But what if Hrothgar was not so inclined to the Geats? What if he had never heard of Beowulf, nor of his father? How does the Danish lord deal with those whom he believes to have no chance against Grendel?
Based on his imploring Wulfgar to make sure that the Geats know "that they are welcome/in these Danish lands!" ("þæt hie sint wilcuman/Deniga leodum." (ll.388-389a) (which sounds almost as if he's asking Wulfgar to communicate this welcome in every word), a cold reception would entail a cold welcome.
That sounds obvious enough.
But would that mean an ejection from the hall? An outright attack? The Geats have come quite heavily armed, after all. Such a violent reception could be expected. Though the Geats did respect whatever etiquette exists in putting their spears and shields to the side of the door when they came in. Swords may have been worn as a last line of defense, or as a mark of nobility, though, and so be perfectly allowed even in a hall. Or maybe the Geats didn't want to drop their guard entirely. We aren't exactly told that all of the Danes in the hall are wearing swords (or if any are, for that matter).
So a hostile reply would likely be a formal request to leave the hall and return whence they came.
In point of fact, aside from Wulfgar's being told to warmly welcome them and that they'll eventually be rewarded for their courage, we're not really told what a warm Danish welcome entails. Is this the poet/scribe using some telling to set up a bunch of showing?
Back To Top
The case of the curious compounds
Old English compound words are usually very straightforward. There's some phenomenon or item that is more specific than the usual words for it have connotation to cover and so two words are combined. For example, there's "sorg" for sorrow, and then there's "modsorg" for the more intense "heart-sorrow."
Such compounds make sense because they are the sum of their parts.
But in this week's passage there are two compound words that are more than the sum of their parts.
The word "arstæfum" is Old English for "support," "assistance," "kindness," "benefit," or "grace." It is made up of "ar" ("servant," "messenger," "herald," "apostle," "angel") and "stæfum" ((singular, stæf) "staff," "stick," "rod;" "pastoral staff;" "letter," "character," "writing;" "document;" "letters," "literature," "learning"). Maybe to Anglo-Saxon minds the herald or apostle of writing, literature, or learning are a support or a benefit, but I'm willing to bet that to most modern minds that connection isn't as immediately made as "mod" and "sorg" being "heart-sorrow."
Nonetheless, there is the religious and poetic combination of "benefit" (or "grace") and "pastoral staff" which sounds like just what Hrothgar is talking about when he states his belief that Beowulf has been sent by god. So perhaps this word isn't as literal a compound word as most others, but instead results from the combination of the senses of its two parts.
A similar case could be made for "mod-þræce" meaning "courage."
This word is a combination of "mod" ("heart," "mind," "spirit," "mood," "temper;" "arrogance," "pride," "power;" "violence") and "þræce" ("throng," "pressure," "fury," "storm," "violence," "onrush," "attack"). With such individual meanings combining it's hard to see how these two words combine into one that means "courage." Especially since modern everyday courage could be described as a "violence of the spirit," but generally doesn't happen in violent circumstances. As such, this compound sheds some light on the world from which it comes. Courage then may have included standing up to a bully as it does now, but then the follow through was much more likely to be a violent clash of one sort or another.
Though, that's just one interpretation.
It's also possible that combining such words to mean courage is meant to add a slightly negative connotation to the word. Perhaps "mod-þræce" isn't intended to refer to a clean and tidy courage, but something more akin to the boldness of a berserk state. A kind of controlled fury. Something that even the poem's early audiences well knew was dangerous, but that was also contained and controlled - for the most part.
Anyone with the strength of thirty men in his grip must have been considered at least a little bit monstrous even then after all.
Back To Top
Closing
Next week, Wulfgar rushes back to the Geats to relay Hrothgar's message.
Back To Top
Thursday, May 15, 2014
Hrothgar as grammatical relic and Beowulf's grandfather? (ll.371-381a) [Old English]
Abstract
Translation
Recordings
Hrothgar as relic
Ambiguity in spelling
Closing
Back To Top
Abstract
Hrothgar speaks, acknowledging Beowulf's parentage and his reputation.
Back To Top
Translation
"Hrothgar spoke, protector of the Scyldings:
'I knew him when he was a boy;
his father of old was called Ecgtheow,
Hrethel of the Geats gave to him
his only daughter; now I hear his son
has come here, seeking favourable friendship.
Once sailors, that brought gifts
from Geatland thither as thanks,
said that he has the might of
thirty men in his hand-grip,
famed in war**.'"
(Beowulf ll.371-381a)
Back To Top
Recordings
Old English:
{Forthcoming}
Modern English:
{Forthcoming}
Back To Top
Hrothgar as relic
Beowulf is an old poem. Whether you agree with those scholars who place its creation as a written piece of literature sometime around the eleventh century or with those who place it around the seventh, it's still an old poem. As such, many early translations of it gave it a very authoritative "thee and thou" sort of tone. Take this passage from Francis Gummere's famed Edwardian translation, for instance:
It sounds like an old poem. Yet, if you compare that to Seamus Heaney's much more recent translation of the same passage it seems a little younger:
The difference is clear in Heaney's preference for a more common, everyday syntax.
Interestingly, though, Hrothgar's dialogue tends more towards Gummere's version.
Alliteration is a major feature of Old English poetry. Don't ask why rhyming hadn't caught on as much, no doubt it had to do with the sounds that English used at the time. When you learn to read Old English it isn't a very sing-song tongue after all. But even keeping in mind the frequency of alliteration in the main text of Beowulf, Hrothgar really puts this poetic device to use. What's more, he seems to really like the first sound of his name since much of the alliteration in his dialogue is "h" alliteration.
Perhaps littering his lines with "h" alliterations was the poet/scribe's way of showing which lines were Hrothgar's. Early writing was pretty scant on punctuation marks, and readers would much appreciate that sort of signal whether they were reading aloud or more silently to themselves.
But what Hrothgar's taste for alliteration signals to me is that even in the world of the poem he's a relic. Even some of his syntax is so much like Gummere's translation that I'm left wondering if the original poet/scribe was actively copying a kind of old, poetic style for the elder Dane. I mean, lines like
would translate literally as
Word order is shuffled, and clauses are delayed into a strange arrangement. It's almost as if Hrothgar is a living link to an earlier time in the world, a time that is ending just as Beowulf's own era is beginning. No wonder Hrothgar came across as depressed in last week's entry.
But perhaps that's the point. Amongst all of the battles and the monsters Beowulf is positioned as a figure of transition. From the old ways to the new. From the old gods equated with "the soul-slaying fiend" (l.178) to the new "Lord" who keeps saving Beowulf's bacon as he gets it ever closer not to the frying pan but to the flames.
Back To Top
Ambiguity in spelling
Old English's lack of regulated spelling makes translation difficult at times. Most modern editions of texts will have some degree of standardization to their spelling, but there are still some outlier words. Take for example line 373's "ealdfæder."
Translated literally, I would render this compound word "old-father" possibly even "grandfather." Such a translation isn't out of the question, since "ealdfæder" could be a variation of "ieldrafæder," the Old English word for "grandfather."
However, in the context that "ealdfæder" appears, such a translation is troublesome. This difficulty comes up because the word refers to Ecgtheow who is Beowulf's father and most certainly not his grandfather.
It's a tiny detail, and, to be honest, "ealdfæder" is probably in that line simply to alliterate with "Ecgtheow." But nonetheless, it's a bit disorienting to come across such a word when you expect a simple "father" to come up.
Heaney changed "father" to "father before him" in his translation, and I think that's a great choice. It sets this appearance of Ecgtheow's apart from the others, and also acknowledges the element of time inherent in "ealdfæder." It's the same reason that I appended "of old" to the word, despite the ambiguity this phrase brings into the matter. Namely, was Beowulf's father once called "Ecgtheow" but is now called something else? Or is Ecgtheow now long dead and hence is himself "of old"?
Back To Top
Closing
Next week Hrothgar concludes the message he sends back to Beowulf via Wulfgar.
Back To Top
Translation
Recordings
Hrothgar as relic
Ambiguity in spelling
Closing
Back To Top
Abstract
Hrothgar speaks, acknowledging Beowulf's parentage and his reputation.
Back To Top
Translation
"Hrothgar spoke, protector of the Scyldings:
'I knew him when he was a boy;
his father of old was called Ecgtheow,
Hrethel of the Geats gave to him
his only daughter; now I hear his son
has come here, seeking favourable friendship.
Once sailors, that brought gifts
from Geatland thither as thanks,
said that he has the might of
thirty men in his hand-grip,
famed in war**.'"
(Beowulf ll.371-381a)
Back To Top
Recordings
Old English:
{Forthcoming}
Modern English:
{Forthcoming}
Back To Top
Hrothgar as relic
Beowulf is an old poem. Whether you agree with those scholars who place its creation as a written piece of literature sometime around the eleventh century or with those who place it around the seventh, it's still an old poem. As such, many early translations of it gave it a very authoritative "thee and thou" sort of tone. Take this passage from Francis Gummere's famed Edwardian translation, for instance:
"HROTHGAR answered, helmet of Scyldings: --
'I knew him of yore in his youthful days;
his aged father was Ecgtheow named,
to whom, at home, gave Hrethel the Geat
his only daughter.'" (ll.371-375a from gutenberg.org)
It sounds like an old poem. Yet, if you compare that to Seamus Heaney's much more recent translation of the same passage it seems a little younger:
"Hrothgar, protector of Shieldings, replied:
'I used to know him when he was a young boy.
His father before him was called Ecgtheow.
Hrethel the Geat gave Ecgtheow
his daughter in marriage.'"
(ll.371-375a from Seamus Heaney's Beowulf)
The difference is clear in Heaney's preference for a more common, everyday syntax.
Interestingly, though, Hrothgar's dialogue tends more towards Gummere's version.
Alliteration is a major feature of Old English poetry. Don't ask why rhyming hadn't caught on as much, no doubt it had to do with the sounds that English used at the time. When you learn to read Old English it isn't a very sing-song tongue after all. But even keeping in mind the frequency of alliteration in the main text of Beowulf, Hrothgar really puts this poetic device to use. What's more, he seems to really like the first sound of his name since much of the alliteration in his dialogue is "h" alliteration.
Perhaps littering his lines with "h" alliterations was the poet/scribe's way of showing which lines were Hrothgar's. Early writing was pretty scant on punctuation marks, and readers would much appreciate that sort of signal whether they were reading aloud or more silently to themselves.
But what Hrothgar's taste for alliteration signals to me is that even in the world of the poem he's a relic. Even some of his syntax is so much like Gummere's translation that I'm left wondering if the original poet/scribe was actively copying a kind of old, poetic style for the elder Dane. I mean, lines like
"ðonne sægdon þæt sæliþende,/þa ðe gifsceattas Geata fyredon/þyder to þance, þæt he XXXtiges/manna mægencræft on his mundgripe"
would translate literally as
"Once said of him sailors,/those that gifts from Geatland brought/thither as thanks, that he thirty/men's might has in his hand-grip" (ll.377-380).
Word order is shuffled, and clauses are delayed into a strange arrangement. It's almost as if Hrothgar is a living link to an earlier time in the world, a time that is ending just as Beowulf's own era is beginning. No wonder Hrothgar came across as depressed in last week's entry.
But perhaps that's the point. Amongst all of the battles and the monsters Beowulf is positioned as a figure of transition. From the old ways to the new. From the old gods equated with "the soul-slaying fiend" (l.178) to the new "Lord" who keeps saving Beowulf's bacon as he gets it ever closer not to the frying pan but to the flames.
Back To Top
Ambiguity in spelling
Old English's lack of regulated spelling makes translation difficult at times. Most modern editions of texts will have some degree of standardization to their spelling, but there are still some outlier words. Take for example line 373's "ealdfæder."
Translated literally, I would render this compound word "old-father" possibly even "grandfather." Such a translation isn't out of the question, since "ealdfæder" could be a variation of "ieldrafæder," the Old English word for "grandfather."
However, in the context that "ealdfæder" appears, such a translation is troublesome. This difficulty comes up because the word refers to Ecgtheow who is Beowulf's father and most certainly not his grandfather.
It's a tiny detail, and, to be honest, "ealdfæder" is probably in that line simply to alliterate with "Ecgtheow." But nonetheless, it's a bit disorienting to come across such a word when you expect a simple "father" to come up.
Heaney changed "father" to "father before him" in his translation, and I think that's a great choice. It sets this appearance of Ecgtheow's apart from the others, and also acknowledges the element of time inherent in "ealdfæder." It's the same reason that I appended "of old" to the word, despite the ambiguity this phrase brings into the matter. Namely, was Beowulf's father once called "Ecgtheow" but is now called something else? Or is Ecgtheow now long dead and hence is himself "of old"?
Back To Top
Closing
Next week Hrothgar concludes the message he sends back to Beowulf via Wulfgar.
Back To Top
Friday, May 9, 2014
On Hrothgar and "equipment" (ll.356-370) [Old English]
Abstract
Translation
Recordings
Hrothgar as depressed Dane
Noble customs and "equipment"
Closing
Back To Top
Abstract
Wulfgar brings Beowulf's petition to Hrothgar. His tone makes a positive reply seem like a long shot.
Back To Top
Translation
"Then quickly he turned, to face where Hrothgar sat,
old and hoar among the throng of his thanes;
he went to the one of honourable deeds, stood shoulder to shoulder
with the Danish lord: knew he their noble customs.
Wulfgar spoke to his friend and lord:
'Here are those who came, who ventured
forth going over the sea from the Geatish lands;
their chief champion
they call Beowulf, he is the petitioner,
the one asking, my lord, if he might mix
words with you. Do not propose to deny
your reply, gracious Hrothgar:
by his war-gear I think their worth
that of esteemed warriors; indeed he seems dependable,
the one warrior who has lead them so far.'"
(Beowulf ll.356-370)
Back To Top
Recordings
Old English:
{Forthcoming}
Modern English:
{Forthcoming}
Back To Top
Hrothgar as depressed Dane
Is this speech a sign of Wulfgar's knowledge of the Dane's "duguðe þeaw," ("noble customs" (l.359)) or is it an honest plea to a forlorn lord?
The honorifics ("my lord" ("þeoden min" (l.365)), "gracious Hrothgar" ("glædman Hroðgar" (l.367))) seem like things said as parts of Wulfgar's addressing Hrothgar. They sound like what's required of someone lower speaking to the highest ranking individual in the Dane's hierarchy.
But, it's hard to read Wulfgar's imploring Hrothgar to "not propose to deny/your reply" ("No ðu him wearne geteoh/ðinra gegncwida" (ll.366-67)) without hearing an imploring note. There's something in those words that speaks to the Dane's desperation. Perhaps Hrothgar has fallen into a depression after seeing so many warriors fall to Grendel's might. Or, as Neil Gaiman would have it, Hrothgar is covering up some past misdeed of his with sorrow.
I believe that Hrothgar has fallen victim to depression.
Sitting amongst his warriors he's no doubt reminded of how he valiantly fought to bring peace to his lands. And, being surrounded by those who are enjoying themselves in Heorot, he is no doubt reminded of the efforts that went into the construction of that glittering mead hall. And yet, empty seats all around him bring phantoms into his vision, ghosts of the past that hang off of his memory like overripe apples heavy with both savour and with worms.
Anyone in that state of mind is likely to wave away petitioners and those willing to help without a further thought. Hrothgar seems to have no reason to look out from the past, he has nothing to look forward too, after all.
Anyone in that sort of state would need someone like Wulfgar to talk them back to the present. Someone to inspire some hope in them, as Wulfgar attempts to. And, as we'll see next week, there are hints that Wulfgar's mentioning Beowulf's name and his merit in bringing his fellow Geats so far that the attempt is successful. Hrothgar brightens - but stays well within the bounds of the customs of the nobility.
Back To Top
Noble customs and "equipment"
As high and noble as the customs of a ruling host may be, they bear a striking resemblance to the customs of modern day politicians. Both are full of seemingly empty words.
At least for our scholarly purposes, there aren't many words of great interest in Wulfgar's speech.
Even the words used for "noble customs" (l.359), "duguðe þeaw," isn't necessarily all that interesting.
The first word in the pair means "body of noble retainers, people, host, the heavenly host, strength," and the second means "usage, custom, morals, morality." So, like most other systems of conduct, there's a suggestion of the Danes' system having a higher origin (translating the phrase as "the custom of the heavenly host"). There's also, perhaps reflecting poorly on Beowulf's time to our modern eyes, the translation "the custom of strength," that could be construed as "might makes right." Curious how heaven and power have that sort of relation - however distant.
More interesting in an archaic sort of way, part of the word "getawum" ("war-gear" (l.368)) once had a different meaning. This sense of "taw-u," the root of "getawum," once meant "genitalia" (along with "apparatus, and "implement"). But, even to Beowulf's early audiences, I'm willing to guess whatever sense of "genitalia" was inherent in "getawum" was a distant echo, something that only the scholarly among them would catch.
Nonetheless, maybe this sense (or the spirit?) of "getawum," after some major transformations, came to rest in modern euphemisms like "bait and tackle."
Back To Top
Closing
Next week we hear Hrothgar's whispered reply to Wulfgar, and perhaps see the first stirrings of hope in this downcast ruler of a people.
Back To Top
Translation
Recordings
Hrothgar as depressed Dane
Noble customs and "equipment"
Closing
Back To Top
Abstract
Wulfgar brings Beowulf's petition to Hrothgar. His tone makes a positive reply seem like a long shot.
Back To Top
Translation
"Then quickly he turned, to face where Hrothgar sat,
old and hoar among the throng of his thanes;
he went to the one of honourable deeds, stood shoulder to shoulder
with the Danish lord: knew he their noble customs.
Wulfgar spoke to his friend and lord:
'Here are those who came, who ventured
forth going over the sea from the Geatish lands;
their chief champion
they call Beowulf, he is the petitioner,
the one asking, my lord, if he might mix
words with you. Do not propose to deny
your reply, gracious Hrothgar:
by his war-gear I think their worth
that of esteemed warriors; indeed he seems dependable,
the one warrior who has lead them so far.'"
(Beowulf ll.356-370)
Back To Top
Recordings
Old English:
{Forthcoming}
Modern English:
{Forthcoming}
Back To Top
Hrothgar as depressed Dane
Is this speech a sign of Wulfgar's knowledge of the Dane's "duguðe þeaw," ("noble customs" (l.359)) or is it an honest plea to a forlorn lord?
The honorifics ("my lord" ("þeoden min" (l.365)), "gracious Hrothgar" ("glædman Hroðgar" (l.367))) seem like things said as parts of Wulfgar's addressing Hrothgar. They sound like what's required of someone lower speaking to the highest ranking individual in the Dane's hierarchy.
But, it's hard to read Wulfgar's imploring Hrothgar to "not propose to deny/your reply" ("No ðu him wearne geteoh/ðinra gegncwida" (ll.366-67)) without hearing an imploring note. There's something in those words that speaks to the Dane's desperation. Perhaps Hrothgar has fallen into a depression after seeing so many warriors fall to Grendel's might. Or, as Neil Gaiman would have it, Hrothgar is covering up some past misdeed of his with sorrow.
I believe that Hrothgar has fallen victim to depression.
Sitting amongst his warriors he's no doubt reminded of how he valiantly fought to bring peace to his lands. And, being surrounded by those who are enjoying themselves in Heorot, he is no doubt reminded of the efforts that went into the construction of that glittering mead hall. And yet, empty seats all around him bring phantoms into his vision, ghosts of the past that hang off of his memory like overripe apples heavy with both savour and with worms.
Anyone in that state of mind is likely to wave away petitioners and those willing to help without a further thought. Hrothgar seems to have no reason to look out from the past, he has nothing to look forward too, after all.
Anyone in that sort of state would need someone like Wulfgar to talk them back to the present. Someone to inspire some hope in them, as Wulfgar attempts to. And, as we'll see next week, there are hints that Wulfgar's mentioning Beowulf's name and his merit in bringing his fellow Geats so far that the attempt is successful. Hrothgar brightens - but stays well within the bounds of the customs of the nobility.
Back To Top
Noble customs and "equipment"
As high and noble as the customs of a ruling host may be, they bear a striking resemblance to the customs of modern day politicians. Both are full of seemingly empty words.
At least for our scholarly purposes, there aren't many words of great interest in Wulfgar's speech.
Even the words used for "noble customs" (l.359), "duguðe þeaw," isn't necessarily all that interesting.
The first word in the pair means "body of noble retainers, people, host, the heavenly host, strength," and the second means "usage, custom, morals, morality." So, like most other systems of conduct, there's a suggestion of the Danes' system having a higher origin (translating the phrase as "the custom of the heavenly host"). There's also, perhaps reflecting poorly on Beowulf's time to our modern eyes, the translation "the custom of strength," that could be construed as "might makes right." Curious how heaven and power have that sort of relation - however distant.
More interesting in an archaic sort of way, part of the word "getawum" ("war-gear" (l.368)) once had a different meaning. This sense of "taw-u," the root of "getawum," once meant "genitalia" (along with "apparatus, and "implement"). But, even to Beowulf's early audiences, I'm willing to guess whatever sense of "genitalia" was inherent in "getawum" was a distant echo, something that only the scholarly among them would catch.
Nonetheless, maybe this sense (or the spirit?) of "getawum," after some major transformations, came to rest in modern euphemisms like "bait and tackle."
Back To Top
Closing
Next week we hear Hrothgar's whispered reply to Wulfgar, and perhaps see the first stirrings of hope in this downcast ruler of a people.
Back To Top
Friday, April 25, 2014
Progressive early medieval religion and why that word? (ll.348-355) [Old English]
Abstract
Translation
Recordings
Going deep into a short passage
Wulfgar's wisdom
Closing
Back To Top
Abstract
Wulfgar gives a bureaucratic and ordered reply to Beowulf's request.
Back To Top
Translation
"Wulfgar spoke: a Wendel man,
well known for his heart-thought,
of war and of wisdom: "'I the friend of Danes
will inquire of our shield,
giver of rings, as thou art a petitioner,
of that famed lord, about your journey,
and then the answer I shall convey immediately,
that I may speak as it so pleases him.'"
(Beowulf ll.348-355)
Back To Top
Recordings
Old English:
{Forthcoming}
Modern English:
{Forthcoming}
Back To Top
Going deep into a short passage
This week's passage is no shorter than last week's, but it seems less dense. Maybe I see it this way because Wulfgar isn't a character of action.
Presented in his role as Hrothgar's herald, he is very definitely installed in the Danes' hierarchy and his actions are defined by his place in it. Therefore, his actions seem less interesting than Beowulf's since he isn't acting as an outsider trying to get into the Danes' society. Instead he is already very much an integral part of that society.
That said, Wulfgar is portrayed as a nearly perfect front for Hrothgar. We're not given much of his conduct, but it's easy to picture (quite anachronistically) Wulfgar dressed up in a suit with a smartphone and briefcase acting as Hrothgar's PR guy. Beowulf has put in a petition and Wulfgar's now about to send this request up the line since he sees nothing wrong with it.
Speaking less anachronistically, you could make the case that this relationship, free from emotion as it appears to be, mimics that of god and god's scribe in the Hebrew tradition: The angel Metatron.
Of course, Hrothgar's realm being ravaged by Grendel does not make him out to be a very capable god. Though it is interesting to think of that situation representing the poet/scribe's take on the pagan gods of the Anglo-Saxons: Old, hoary men who have passed their glory years and are in need of a hero to come in and save them - and eventually to supersede them.
It's jumping quite a ways ahead, but there are some who believe that Beowulf is a kind of Christ figure at points in the poem. Combine that with the Anglo-Saxons' taste for the story of Exodus (and no doubt god's struggle against rival gods in that book and the rest of the Old Testament) and it's rather tempting to see Beowulf as the Anglo-Saxons' take on a hunky young god going around showing up and taking down all of the other gods among which people's attentions are split.
Of course, for this reading of Beowulf to work entirely you'd need to figure out what the God-Beowulf's very definite death could mean. Maybe the Anglo-Saxons, with a concept that their own gods could pale and die in comparison with the Christian god also believed that eventually the same would happen to that new Christian deity.
Of course, that's nothing but pure speculation. The sort of speculation that has little to no basis in what we know about Anglo-Saxon religion, since it's hard to say who first uttered the thought that Neitszche would write at the end of the nineteenth century, "God is dead."
Back To Top
Wulfgar's wisdom
Getting back to Wulfgar and his role as Hrothgar's herald. Wulfgar's entirely by the book. He says that he'll ask for Hrothgar's take on the matter (using all due honorifics), that he'll bring answer back immediately, and then that he'll speak as it so pleases Hrothgar. The poet/scribe really goes all in to show just how fastidious Wulfgar is in all this.
So much so that I don't think the translation of of "mod-sefa" as simply "thought" is good enough.
Instead, I think this is a situation that calls for a literal translation from "mod-sefa" to "heart-thought."
Why? (You may ask.)
Because of the clause that follows: "of war and of wisdom" ("wig ond wisdom" (l.350)). Being renowned for "thought" just doesn't suggest a man who is supposed to be wise in the matters of both war and of peace. Instead something that strikes a bit deeper, like "heart-thought" seems better suited. Not because his thoughts are necessarily borne of passion, but because they are a combination of instinct and reason.
This interpretation of "mod-sefa"s meaning might be a bit much, but I really think that's what the word means in situations like this.
Although it's not stated, Wulfgar is likely an older man, one who has seen many battles at Hrothgar's side and no doubt been with him for many social functions. As such I think it's safe to say that he has internalized a great deal of knowledge. With such a store of knowledge, much of it is likely instinctual, and so Wulfgar's able to bring it forth from his instinct and then temper it with his reason. Thereby making his council sharp as a sword and tough as steel plate.
"Heart-thought" seems the perfect fit.
Back To Top
Closing
Next week, Wulfgar delivers Beowulf's request (in a passage longer than eight lines!).
Back To Top
Translation
Recordings
Going deep into a short passage
Wulfgar's wisdom
Closing
Back To Top
Abstract
Wulfgar gives a bureaucratic and ordered reply to Beowulf's request.
Back To Top
Translation
"Wulfgar spoke: a Wendel man,
well known for his heart-thought,
of war and of wisdom: "'I the friend of Danes
will inquire of our shield,
giver of rings, as thou art a petitioner,
of that famed lord, about your journey,
and then the answer I shall convey immediately,
that I may speak as it so pleases him.'"
(Beowulf ll.348-355)
Back To Top
Recordings
Old English:
{Forthcoming}
Modern English:
{Forthcoming}
Back To Top
Going deep into a short passage
This week's passage is no shorter than last week's, but it seems less dense. Maybe I see it this way because Wulfgar isn't a character of action.
Presented in his role as Hrothgar's herald, he is very definitely installed in the Danes' hierarchy and his actions are defined by his place in it. Therefore, his actions seem less interesting than Beowulf's since he isn't acting as an outsider trying to get into the Danes' society. Instead he is already very much an integral part of that society.
That said, Wulfgar is portrayed as a nearly perfect front for Hrothgar. We're not given much of his conduct, but it's easy to picture (quite anachronistically) Wulfgar dressed up in a suit with a smartphone and briefcase acting as Hrothgar's PR guy. Beowulf has put in a petition and Wulfgar's now about to send this request up the line since he sees nothing wrong with it.
Speaking less anachronistically, you could make the case that this relationship, free from emotion as it appears to be, mimics that of god and god's scribe in the Hebrew tradition: The angel Metatron.
Of course, Hrothgar's realm being ravaged by Grendel does not make him out to be a very capable god. Though it is interesting to think of that situation representing the poet/scribe's take on the pagan gods of the Anglo-Saxons: Old, hoary men who have passed their glory years and are in need of a hero to come in and save them - and eventually to supersede them.
It's jumping quite a ways ahead, but there are some who believe that Beowulf is a kind of Christ figure at points in the poem. Combine that with the Anglo-Saxons' taste for the story of Exodus (and no doubt god's struggle against rival gods in that book and the rest of the Old Testament) and it's rather tempting to see Beowulf as the Anglo-Saxons' take on a hunky young god going around showing up and taking down all of the other gods among which people's attentions are split.
Of course, for this reading of Beowulf to work entirely you'd need to figure out what the God-Beowulf's very definite death could mean. Maybe the Anglo-Saxons, with a concept that their own gods could pale and die in comparison with the Christian god also believed that eventually the same would happen to that new Christian deity.
Of course, that's nothing but pure speculation. The sort of speculation that has little to no basis in what we know about Anglo-Saxon religion, since it's hard to say who first uttered the thought that Neitszche would write at the end of the nineteenth century, "God is dead."
Back To Top
Wulfgar's wisdom
Getting back to Wulfgar and his role as Hrothgar's herald. Wulfgar's entirely by the book. He says that he'll ask for Hrothgar's take on the matter (using all due honorifics), that he'll bring answer back immediately, and then that he'll speak as it so pleases Hrothgar. The poet/scribe really goes all in to show just how fastidious Wulfgar is in all this.
So much so that I don't think the translation of of "mod-sefa" as simply "thought" is good enough.
Instead, I think this is a situation that calls for a literal translation from "mod-sefa" to "heart-thought."
Why? (You may ask.)
Because of the clause that follows: "of war and of wisdom" ("wig ond wisdom" (l.350)). Being renowned for "thought" just doesn't suggest a man who is supposed to be wise in the matters of both war and of peace. Instead something that strikes a bit deeper, like "heart-thought" seems better suited. Not because his thoughts are necessarily borne of passion, but because they are a combination of instinct and reason.
This interpretation of "mod-sefa"s meaning might be a bit much, but I really think that's what the word means in situations like this.
Although it's not stated, Wulfgar is likely an older man, one who has seen many battles at Hrothgar's side and no doubt been with him for many social functions. As such I think it's safe to say that he has internalized a great deal of knowledge. With such a store of knowledge, much of it is likely instinctual, and so Wulfgar's able to bring it forth from his instinct and then temper it with his reason. Thereby making his council sharp as a sword and tough as steel plate.
"Heart-thought" seems the perfect fit.
Back To Top
Closing
Next week, Wulfgar delivers Beowulf's request (in a passage longer than eight lines!).
Back To Top
Friday, April 18, 2014
Beowulf's rhetoric (ll.340-347) [Old English]
Abstract
Translation
Recordings
Introductory patterns
Is there a mic in that helmet?
Closing
Back To Top
Abstract
Beowulf replies to Wulfgar with his origins, but masks his purpose with formality.
Back To Top
Translation
"'One man among them courageously answered,
the proud man of the Weders, spoke after those words,
bold beneath his helm: "We are Hygelac's
table-companions; Beowulf is my name.
I will explain to the son of Halfdane,
that famed lord, my errand,
your prince, if he will grant us such,
that we may greet him graciously.'"
(Beowulf ll.340-347)
Back To Top
Recordings
Old English:
{Forthcoming}
Modern English:
{Forthcoming}
Back To Top
Introductory patterns
Despite the brevity of this passage, there are some things that can be said about it.
Not the least of which is the continuation of a pattern we've seen before.
In 6 February's entry (in which Beowulf introduces himself to the coastguard, ll258-269), we saw that Beowulf didn't just say outright "I am Beowulf." Instead he introduced his group as friends of Hygelac's, and then introduced himself primarily through his father.
Once again, Beowulf introduces the group first, with a similar line explaining their relationship with Hygelac (l.342). But then, instead of introducing his father and merely claiming to be his son, we hear Beowulf say for the first time in the poem that takes his name, "Beowulf is my name" ("Beowulf is min nama" (l.343)).
Surely the herald of a great prince like Hrothgar commands more respect than a coastguard?
So then why does Beowulf simply give his own name (a name which makes no reference to his father)?
My theory is that this has to do with the intimacy of the hall setting.
Although this conversation is still very formalized, Heorot is nonetheless a place of leisure. It's where Hrothgar and his thanes hang out and trade treasures and stories between battles and forays. The hall would even draw strangers into Hrothgar's hospitality, at least, were it not for Grendel. As such, Beowulf has no need to show his "son of" card just yet.
Even so, the other curious thing about Beowulf's shift in tone is that he keeps his purpose for from Hrothgar's herald. Instead of declaiming for all to hear, "I am Beowulf! I'm here to kill your monster" (as a cg'd Ray Winstone did), he says that he'll reveal just what his purpose is when he speaks to Hrothgar.
I think this feint is meant to show Beowulf's social acumen. In a hall besieged for twelve years by some seemingly invincible terror, anyone (especially anyone as young as Beowulf's supposed to be here) coming around claiming to be there to deal with Grendel is likely not going to be believed. Likely, for most of those twelve years such an approach hasn't been useful. Those who did come in with boasts blaring were probably laughed out of the hall.
And once you've been laughed out of something it's all the harder to win glory there.
Back To Top
Is there a mic in that helmet?
All the more so if you appear ridiculous. It might seem Beowulf would were he still wearing his helmet, as the poet suggests on line 342. But this detail appears to bolster his position.
Maybe it's all just to keep building up the mystery around these Geats among the Danes. The Geats' helmets are supposed to have cheek-guards, and you'd think that they would protect the helmet's wearer from sight as well as blows.
Or perhaps the poet is engaging in a bit of embellishment. Painting Beowulf into a bit of a caricature of a warrior. He keeps his helmet on so that he can be ever vigilant. Or maybe because it's simply the outfit of a warrior and keeping his helmet on shows Beowulf's seriousness.
Regardless, I definitely think it's a poetic detail. Though his speaking "bold[ly] beneath his helm" could well be an image of sorts, suggesting that Beowulf spoke as deeply as if he were wearing a helmet. Maybe there's even something about Beowulf's tone itself being a source of protection in such an image.
Back To Top
Closing
Next week, Wulfgar takes Beowulf's message and departs.
Back To Top
Translation
Recordings
Introductory patterns
Is there a mic in that helmet?
Closing
Back To Top
Abstract
Beowulf replies to Wulfgar with his origins, but masks his purpose with formality.
Back To Top
Translation
"'One man among them courageously answered,
the proud man of the Weders, spoke after those words,
bold beneath his helm: "We are Hygelac's
table-companions; Beowulf is my name.
I will explain to the son of Halfdane,
that famed lord, my errand,
your prince, if he will grant us such,
that we may greet him graciously.'"
(Beowulf ll.340-347)
Back To Top
Recordings
Old English:
{Forthcoming}
Modern English:
{Forthcoming}
Back To Top
Introductory patterns
Despite the brevity of this passage, there are some things that can be said about it.
Not the least of which is the continuation of a pattern we've seen before.
In 6 February's entry (in which Beowulf introduces himself to the coastguard, ll258-269), we saw that Beowulf didn't just say outright "I am Beowulf." Instead he introduced his group as friends of Hygelac's, and then introduced himself primarily through his father.
Once again, Beowulf introduces the group first, with a similar line explaining their relationship with Hygelac (l.342). But then, instead of introducing his father and merely claiming to be his son, we hear Beowulf say for the first time in the poem that takes his name, "Beowulf is my name" ("Beowulf is min nama" (l.343)).
Surely the herald of a great prince like Hrothgar commands more respect than a coastguard?
So then why does Beowulf simply give his own name (a name which makes no reference to his father)?
My theory is that this has to do with the intimacy of the hall setting.
Although this conversation is still very formalized, Heorot is nonetheless a place of leisure. It's where Hrothgar and his thanes hang out and trade treasures and stories between battles and forays. The hall would even draw strangers into Hrothgar's hospitality, at least, were it not for Grendel. As such, Beowulf has no need to show his "son of" card just yet.
Even so, the other curious thing about Beowulf's shift in tone is that he keeps his purpose for from Hrothgar's herald. Instead of declaiming for all to hear, "I am Beowulf! I'm here to kill your monster" (as a cg'd Ray Winstone did), he says that he'll reveal just what his purpose is when he speaks to Hrothgar.
I think this feint is meant to show Beowulf's social acumen. In a hall besieged for twelve years by some seemingly invincible terror, anyone (especially anyone as young as Beowulf's supposed to be here) coming around claiming to be there to deal with Grendel is likely not going to be believed. Likely, for most of those twelve years such an approach hasn't been useful. Those who did come in with boasts blaring were probably laughed out of the hall.
And once you've been laughed out of something it's all the harder to win glory there.
Back To Top
Is there a mic in that helmet?
All the more so if you appear ridiculous. It might seem Beowulf would were he still wearing his helmet, as the poet suggests on line 342. But this detail appears to bolster his position.
Maybe it's all just to keep building up the mystery around these Geats among the Danes. The Geats' helmets are supposed to have cheek-guards, and you'd think that they would protect the helmet's wearer from sight as well as blows.
Or perhaps the poet is engaging in a bit of embellishment. Painting Beowulf into a bit of a caricature of a warrior. He keeps his helmet on so that he can be ever vigilant. Or maybe because it's simply the outfit of a warrior and keeping his helmet on shows Beowulf's seriousness.
Regardless, I definitely think it's a poetic detail. Though his speaking "bold[ly] beneath his helm" could well be an image of sorts, suggesting that Beowulf spoke as deeply as if he were wearing a helmet. Maybe there's even something about Beowulf's tone itself being a source of protection in such an image.
Back To Top
Closing
Next week, Wulfgar takes Beowulf's message and departs.
Back To Top
Saturday, April 12, 2014
Exile and bandits' weapon of choice (ll.331b-339) [Old English]
Abstract
Translation
Recordings
Finding community among exiles?
A word for spear
Closing
Back To Top
Abstract
Hrothgar's herald questions the Geats' origins.
Back To Top
Translation
"Then a proud warrior
asked after those men's origins:
'Where come ye of the anointed shields,
shirts of grey mail and visored helms,
this crowd of spears? I am Hrothgar's
herald and officer. Never saw I this many men
from far away of such high spirits.
It seems to me that you for glory, not at all for exile,
yay for courage have sought out Hrothgar.'"
(Beowulf ll.331b-339)
Back To Top
Recordings
Old English:
{Forthcoming}
Modern English:
{Forthcoming}
Back To Top
Finding community among exiles?
Hrothgar's herald says something more than passing strange in what seems to be passing. On lines 336 to 337 he states that he has "Never [seen] this many men/from far away of such high spirits" ("Ne seah ic elþeodige/þus manige men modiglicran").
Given the fact that challengers to Grendel have probably dried up over the past twelve years of his reign of terror, it's fair to say that this man's probably not seen many foreigners lately.
Even when heroes in waiting were coming by Heorot, they were probably more grim and serious than the apparently boisterous Geats (though we're not really told this - maybe they were like giddy teenagers in the presence of some musical idol, all jostling together and too nervous to speak, and that's what their weapons jostling last week was all about).
So the herald probably speaks true. He never has seen so many foreigners and in such high spirits.
But the word he uses for foreigners ("elþeodige") could also be translated as "exiled people."
The difference between "foreigners" and "exiled people" may seem slight, perhaps. But if the herald mentions exiles here then his assertion just a few lines later that these men are not here for exile makes much more sense.
Translating "elþeodige" as "exiled people" also paints a curious picture.
The image of a group of exiles is, strangely, the perfect representation of the importance of community to Anglo-Saxons. Among them, exile was considered a fate worse than death.
Partially because being exiled meant that you lost your social standing and whatever came with it. But at least as much as that if not more, exile meant that you were cut off from the people with whom you shared an ipso facto relationship through blood. You didn't earn their trust, nor did you work for their friendship - ties of kinship were supposed to be the reliable ties that saw you through the hardships of life.
Being exiled cut you off from all of that, but at the same time, it wouldn't be impossible for exiles to meet while in their respective outcast states. That a group of exiles would find each other, and, one can only assume, band together under the common aegis of their exiles shows just how important having a group and belonging was.
All of that said, whether or not such a hypothetical band of exiles would be in high spirits because they had found new community is hard to say.
It's possible that their common state would cause these exiles to form a strong bond in which case high spirits would definitely be possible.
Though it's also possible that though their respective communities no longer regard them as members, the exiles would still see themselves as Angles, or Saxons, or Danes, or Geats. In which case, they would likely still hold the prejudices of these groups.
Whatever the case with such a group of exiles is, either their numbers or their spirits were great enough for Hrothgar's herald to believe these Geats before him to be not exiles but something else.
Back To Top
A word for spear
Another extract, and another batch of crazy words. The craziest this week, though, has got to be "here-sceaft."
The second part of this compound word for "spear" might look familiar. It's the word that eventually became the name of a famed and funky 70s private detective. Shaft.
But the first part of "here-sceaft" is where meanings become bizarre. Standing alone, this word could mean "troop," "army," "host," "multitude," or "predatory band."
So the spear is very much the common man's weapon. All right. But then, since "here" can mean "predatory band" is it also the weapon of choice for bandits and thieves?
Logically, the answer would have to be yes.
If a spear was something that you could easily come by in Anglo Saxon England, then certainly it would be the scoff-law's preferred weapon. Swords certainly wouldn't be lying around, that's for sure.
Actually, pushing logic a bit further, is it possible that swords were harder to come by simply because smiths who could work such large pieces of metal were hard to come by? Or, more likely, forges that could get such a lump of metal hot enough were rare?
Because making a spear requires making nothing more than a little pointy hat for a stick (or you could forgo the hat and shave the stick to a sharp point).
Given the fact that the resources consumed in making a sword were that much greater than those used for a simple spear really makes me wonder if associating the spear with bandits (even at the level of language like "here-sceaft") and the commons was just another thing that elevated the sword to the point where it became a prestigious and noble weapon.
Clearly, if "here-sceaft" has the potential for negative connotations as I believe it does, then the cultural elevation of the sword had happened long before Beowulf was written.
But then, when?
At the very moment that someone working their forge to ridiculous heats threw in big long chunks of metal and wound up with something no other forge-user in the area ever thought possible?
When technology and manufacturing are so unrestricted as they are today it's hard to imagine something so simple as a long pointy piece of sharpened metal being impressive, but it certainly would've been when making such things was harder.
And it's easy to see, then, that something as low-tech as a spear could be associated with "predatory bands."
Back To Top
Closing
Next week, Beowulf answers Hrothgar's herald.
Back To Top
Translation
Recordings
Finding community among exiles?
A word for spear
Closing
Back To Top
Abstract
Hrothgar's herald questions the Geats' origins.
Back To Top
Translation
"Then a proud warrior
asked after those men's origins:
'Where come ye of the anointed shields,
shirts of grey mail and visored helms,
this crowd of spears? I am Hrothgar's
herald and officer. Never saw I this many men
from far away of such high spirits.
It seems to me that you for glory, not at all for exile,
yay for courage have sought out Hrothgar.'"
(Beowulf ll.331b-339)
Back To Top
Recordings
Old English:
{Forthcoming}
Modern English:
{Forthcoming}
Back To Top
Finding community among exiles?
Hrothgar's herald says something more than passing strange in what seems to be passing. On lines 336 to 337 he states that he has "Never [seen] this many men/from far away of such high spirits" ("Ne seah ic elþeodige/þus manige men modiglicran").
Given the fact that challengers to Grendel have probably dried up over the past twelve years of his reign of terror, it's fair to say that this man's probably not seen many foreigners lately.
Even when heroes in waiting were coming by Heorot, they were probably more grim and serious than the apparently boisterous Geats (though we're not really told this - maybe they were like giddy teenagers in the presence of some musical idol, all jostling together and too nervous to speak, and that's what their weapons jostling last week was all about).
So the herald probably speaks true. He never has seen so many foreigners and in such high spirits.
But the word he uses for foreigners ("elþeodige") could also be translated as "exiled people."
The difference between "foreigners" and "exiled people" may seem slight, perhaps. But if the herald mentions exiles here then his assertion just a few lines later that these men are not here for exile makes much more sense.
Translating "elþeodige" as "exiled people" also paints a curious picture.
The image of a group of exiles is, strangely, the perfect representation of the importance of community to Anglo-Saxons. Among them, exile was considered a fate worse than death.
Partially because being exiled meant that you lost your social standing and whatever came with it. But at least as much as that if not more, exile meant that you were cut off from the people with whom you shared an ipso facto relationship through blood. You didn't earn their trust, nor did you work for their friendship - ties of kinship were supposed to be the reliable ties that saw you through the hardships of life.
Being exiled cut you off from all of that, but at the same time, it wouldn't be impossible for exiles to meet while in their respective outcast states. That a group of exiles would find each other, and, one can only assume, band together under the common aegis of their exiles shows just how important having a group and belonging was.
All of that said, whether or not such a hypothetical band of exiles would be in high spirits because they had found new community is hard to say.
It's possible that their common state would cause these exiles to form a strong bond in which case high spirits would definitely be possible.
Though it's also possible that though their respective communities no longer regard them as members, the exiles would still see themselves as Angles, or Saxons, or Danes, or Geats. In which case, they would likely still hold the prejudices of these groups.
Whatever the case with such a group of exiles is, either their numbers or their spirits were great enough for Hrothgar's herald to believe these Geats before him to be not exiles but something else.
Back To Top
A word for spear
Another extract, and another batch of crazy words. The craziest this week, though, has got to be "here-sceaft."
The second part of this compound word for "spear" might look familiar. It's the word that eventually became the name of a famed and funky 70s private detective. Shaft.
But the first part of "here-sceaft" is where meanings become bizarre. Standing alone, this word could mean "troop," "army," "host," "multitude," or "predatory band."
So the spear is very much the common man's weapon. All right. But then, since "here" can mean "predatory band" is it also the weapon of choice for bandits and thieves?
Logically, the answer would have to be yes.
If a spear was something that you could easily come by in Anglo Saxon England, then certainly it would be the scoff-law's preferred weapon. Swords certainly wouldn't be lying around, that's for sure.
Actually, pushing logic a bit further, is it possible that swords were harder to come by simply because smiths who could work such large pieces of metal were hard to come by? Or, more likely, forges that could get such a lump of metal hot enough were rare?
Because making a spear requires making nothing more than a little pointy hat for a stick (or you could forgo the hat and shave the stick to a sharp point).
Given the fact that the resources consumed in making a sword were that much greater than those used for a simple spear really makes me wonder if associating the spear with bandits (even at the level of language like "here-sceaft") and the commons was just another thing that elevated the sword to the point where it became a prestigious and noble weapon.
Clearly, if "here-sceaft" has the potential for negative connotations as I believe it does, then the cultural elevation of the sword had happened long before Beowulf was written.
But then, when?
At the very moment that someone working their forge to ridiculous heats threw in big long chunks of metal and wound up with something no other forge-user in the area ever thought possible?
When technology and manufacturing are so unrestricted as they are today it's hard to imagine something so simple as a long pointy piece of sharpened metal being impressive, but it certainly would've been when making such things was harder.
And it's easy to see, then, that something as low-tech as a spear could be associated with "predatory bands."
Back To Top
Closing
Next week, Beowulf answers Hrothgar's herald.
Back To Top
Friday, April 4, 2014
Words and the noise of the Geats' arrival in Heorot (ll.320-331a) [Old English]
Abstract
Translation
Recordings
Word order wonderings
Why the Geats' weapons jostle
Closing
Back To Top
Abstract
Beowulf and his crew come to Heorot and plonk down onto its benches.
Back To Top
Translation
"The way was stone-paven, along the path
the warriors went together. War-byrnies shone,
hard, hand-linked, shining ring-mail from
skilled hands celebrated in song. Shortly they
arrived at the hall in their horrible war gear,
sea-weary they set their shields aside,
battle-hard bucklers, against that hall's wall;
they dropped onto the benches, mailshirts ringing,
those war-skilled men. Spears stood,
bound in a seaman's bunch, all together,
ashen shaft over grey; that iron-clad crew's
weapons jostled."
(Beowulf ll.320-331a)
Back To Top
Recordings
Old English:
{Forthcoming}
Modern English:
{Forthcoming}
Back To Top
Word order wonderings
It's passages like this that make it abundantly clear that Beowulf is a poem, but also that it's a product of a time quite different from our own. Not just on the obvious levels of social structure and what was considered entertainment, but on the level of language itself.
The brief phrase "æscholt ufan græg" (l.330) that I've translated as "ashen shaft over grey" is a prime example.
Word order in Old English is definitely not as hard and fast as it is for we speakers of Modern English.
Because Old English is a synthetic language (it has declensions), a word's function wasn't defined by its place in the sentence but instead by its different forms.
Take for instance "searwum." This word is the dative plural of "searo". In English this word's translation "skilled"/"skilful" will almost always occur before the noun that it modifies.
We could say "that person is a skillful engineer" or "a skilled artisan." But you'd never hear a native English speaker (of classical English, anyway) say something like "an artisan skilled" without that being followed up with a prepositional phrase for "skilled" to modify ("an artisan skilled in the craft of blacksmithing"). Likewise "engineer skilful" just isn't how English is spoken for the most part. Unless you change that phrase's into a compound adjective with a hyphen.
However, in this passage "song in searwum" is just how it's written. The Old English word for "skilled" or "skilful" is left to the end of the sentence.
But the word's ending shows what it is modifying, it's that ending that establishes its relationship with "hringiren" from line 323. This difference in placement suggests, with a bit of a leap, that native Old English speakers had a greater awareness of words' relationships to each other. English is definitely a difficult language to learn from scratch, but its static structure makes it worlds easier than any synthetic language.
Getting back to "æscholt ufan græg" its word order is a complete mystery to me.
Are there grey and ashen shafts bundled together?
Are the spears being stored counter-intuitively with their points in the ground (perhaps for symbolic or ceremonial reasons)?
At the heart of this issue is the preposition "ufan". This word is said to mean "over," "above," "on high."
Those definitions would seem to rule out the possibility that the phrase "æscholt ufan græg" refers to different coloured spear shafts being bundled together. Although maybe the preposition isn't meant to be taken so literally.
It could be that the ash-shaft spears are over or above those that are grey because they're given a prominent place in the bundle.
Or it could be that they're simply taller.
I'm just not convinced that warriors would store weapons point-down, risking the dulling of their points and edges. Unless sticking your spears in the ground was a sign of peaceful intentions, certainly a fair assessment of their being described as "ashen shafts over grey."
Back To Top
Why the Geats' weapons jostle
Yet, peaceable as the Geats' intentions are, we're told that their weapons jostled as they sat down. Is this to be taken as a sign that those weapons are eager for a fight? Or is it just a matter of the Geats being armed to the teeth?
Though, there's another completely unrelated reason that the poet could give us that aural detail.
Picture this:
You're sitting in a hall with your comrades and kin, along with your lord. You're on edge because you and your people have been mercilessly ravaged night after night by some sort of un-killable fiend.
All is quiet.
Until the door opens and in walk a group of men bristling with arms and armour. They set their weapons to the side and then proceed to plonk down onto your benches - maybe the place where old Higðor Stonefist the stone mason once regularly sat before the demon made off with him leaving nothing behind but the ring that his wife had given him, still attached to the grisly remains of a gnawed finger.
All remains quiet except for the newcomers murmurs of conversation. One of them muffles a laugh. But the biggest one is silent.
Nothing happens.
No one is saying anything now. The entire hall is as quiet as...yes, you think it, a burial mound.
But then the newcomers start to shuffle around on the benches, and their ringcoats (looking resplendent in the fire light) clank, their sheathed swords knock together, and their spears fall from the earth in which they'd been set.
The poet's just used five words to give this detail, but I think, whatever it might mean on a sub-textual level, it's there to break the silence that otherwise exists in the hall. It's there to call the Danes' attention fully to these newcomers and to clear out the hall's quiet (there's no mention of noise or music coming from the hall as the Geats approach it) so that the newcomers can be questioned in the following lines.
If nothing else the jostling of the Geats' weapons restores sound to the world of the hall, one so deep in mourning and sorrow that its collective voice needs to be called forth.
Back To Top
Closing
Next week Hrothgar's top man Wulfgar questions the Geats.
Back To Top
Translation
Recordings
Word order wonderings
Why the Geats' weapons jostle
Closing
Back To Top
Abstract
Beowulf and his crew come to Heorot and plonk down onto its benches.
Back To Top
Translation
"The way was stone-paven, along the path
the warriors went together. War-byrnies shone,
hard, hand-linked, shining ring-mail from
skilled hands celebrated in song. Shortly they
arrived at the hall in their horrible war gear,
sea-weary they set their shields aside,
battle-hard bucklers, against that hall's wall;
they dropped onto the benches, mailshirts ringing,
those war-skilled men. Spears stood,
bound in a seaman's bunch, all together,
ashen shaft over grey; that iron-clad crew's
weapons jostled."
(Beowulf ll.320-331a)
Back To Top
Recordings
Old English:
{Forthcoming}
Modern English:
{Forthcoming}
Back To Top
Word order wonderings
It's passages like this that make it abundantly clear that Beowulf is a poem, but also that it's a product of a time quite different from our own. Not just on the obvious levels of social structure and what was considered entertainment, but on the level of language itself.
The brief phrase "æscholt ufan græg" (l.330) that I've translated as "ashen shaft over grey" is a prime example.
Word order in Old English is definitely not as hard and fast as it is for we speakers of Modern English.
Because Old English is a synthetic language (it has declensions), a word's function wasn't defined by its place in the sentence but instead by its different forms.
Take for instance "searwum." This word is the dative plural of "searo". In English this word's translation "skilled"/"skilful" will almost always occur before the noun that it modifies.
We could say "that person is a skillful engineer" or "a skilled artisan." But you'd never hear a native English speaker (of classical English, anyway) say something like "an artisan skilled" without that being followed up with a prepositional phrase for "skilled" to modify ("an artisan skilled in the craft of blacksmithing"). Likewise "engineer skilful" just isn't how English is spoken for the most part. Unless you change that phrase's into a compound adjective with a hyphen.
However, in this passage "song in searwum" is just how it's written. The Old English word for "skilled" or "skilful" is left to the end of the sentence.
But the word's ending shows what it is modifying, it's that ending that establishes its relationship with "hringiren" from line 323. This difference in placement suggests, with a bit of a leap, that native Old English speakers had a greater awareness of words' relationships to each other. English is definitely a difficult language to learn from scratch, but its static structure makes it worlds easier than any synthetic language.
Getting back to "æscholt ufan græg" its word order is a complete mystery to me.
Are there grey and ashen shafts bundled together?
Are the spears being stored counter-intuitively with their points in the ground (perhaps for symbolic or ceremonial reasons)?
At the heart of this issue is the preposition "ufan". This word is said to mean "over," "above," "on high."
Those definitions would seem to rule out the possibility that the phrase "æscholt ufan græg" refers to different coloured spear shafts being bundled together. Although maybe the preposition isn't meant to be taken so literally.
It could be that the ash-shaft spears are over or above those that are grey because they're given a prominent place in the bundle.
Or it could be that they're simply taller.
I'm just not convinced that warriors would store weapons point-down, risking the dulling of their points and edges. Unless sticking your spears in the ground was a sign of peaceful intentions, certainly a fair assessment of their being described as "ashen shafts over grey."
Back To Top
Why the Geats' weapons jostle
Yet, peaceable as the Geats' intentions are, we're told that their weapons jostled as they sat down. Is this to be taken as a sign that those weapons are eager for a fight? Or is it just a matter of the Geats being armed to the teeth?
Though, there's another completely unrelated reason that the poet could give us that aural detail.
Picture this:
You're sitting in a hall with your comrades and kin, along with your lord. You're on edge because you and your people have been mercilessly ravaged night after night by some sort of un-killable fiend.
All is quiet.
Until the door opens and in walk a group of men bristling with arms and armour. They set their weapons to the side and then proceed to plonk down onto your benches - maybe the place where old Higðor Stonefist the stone mason once regularly sat before the demon made off with him leaving nothing behind but the ring that his wife had given him, still attached to the grisly remains of a gnawed finger.
All remains quiet except for the newcomers murmurs of conversation. One of them muffles a laugh. But the biggest one is silent.
Nothing happens.
No one is saying anything now. The entire hall is as quiet as...yes, you think it, a burial mound.
But then the newcomers start to shuffle around on the benches, and their ringcoats (looking resplendent in the fire light) clank, their sheathed swords knock together, and their spears fall from the earth in which they'd been set.
The poet's just used five words to give this detail, but I think, whatever it might mean on a sub-textual level, it's there to break the silence that otherwise exists in the hall. It's there to call the Danes' attention fully to these newcomers and to clear out the hall's quiet (there's no mention of noise or music coming from the hall as the Geats approach it) so that the newcomers can be questioned in the following lines.
If nothing else the jostling of the Geats' weapons restores sound to the world of the hall, one so deep in mourning and sorrow that its collective voice needs to be called forth.
Back To Top
Closing
Next week Hrothgar's top man Wulfgar questions the Geats.
Back To Top
Thursday, March 27, 2014
The coastguard's farewell (ll.312-319) [Old English]
Abstract
Translation
Recordings
A boastful coastguard?
Meet the new god, same as the old god
Closing
Back To Top
Abstract
The coastguard takes his leave of the Geats, wishing them god's protection.
Back To Top
Translation
"He took the battle brave to the bright
high-souled hall, that he may thither them
go; that hero of combat turned his horse
about, spoke he these words next:
'It is time for me to go. The almighty
father's grace keep you healthy
amidst your quest! I am to the sea,
to hold the shore against fiendish foes.'"
(Beowulf ll.312-319)
Back To Top
Recordings
Old English:
{Forthcoming}
Modern English:
{Forthcoming}
Back To Top
A boastful coastguard?
The coastguard's being called "hero of combat" ("guðbeorna") seems strange. That is, until you notice that it's the third word in an alliterative sequence. But is it only there to hold up a preferred Old English poetic form?
Yeah, probably.
I mean, the coastguard does mention that he has to go back to the coast to guard against "fiendish foes" ("wrað werod" (l.319)). So there could be some verity to his being a "hero of combat." But that term seems a little inflated to me.
Could the poet be having a laugh at the coastguard's expense? "guðbeorna" fit the line that he had written and so he just ran with that and made the coastguard into a bit of a boaster at the end of his speech?
Maybe.
I mean, on the one hand, as much of an exile such a person might feel (even if he does have a crew out there), it definitely wouldn't be wise to send some fop out to guard your coast.
The Danes wouldn't have had the troops to keep a barracks there or anything like that. His crew included, the Danish coastguard in Beowulf probably wouldn't exceed ten men. Tops. So he, the lead coastguard if you will, would definitely need to have proven his mettle in combat.
Though, it's also possible that the position of coastguard is reserved for warriors who are past their prime. No longer able to perform as vigourously on the battlefield they're charged to put their skills and battle-sharpened wits to the test in judging new comers and putting on a fearsome face. With a coast as quiet as the Dane's must be (who, aside from heroes would want to come to a monster-terrorized-golden-hall party?), the job of coastguard definitely seems like something that would get filled by a veteran.
And maybe that's what the poet was going for with the narrative riff on the coastguard's past and then his own seemingly over-zealous admission of what he was heading off to do.
Back To Top
Meet the new god, same as the old god
Throughout Beowulf, people give thanks to a generic male, father god. Many translations (and some instances in the original text) make many of these references into "lord." As such, it's very easy to read these instances of reference to god as references to the Christian god. Since "lord" is frequently used as a deific pronoun in Christianity.
However.
Christianity wasn't the only religion to have a wise, solemn, wrathful, and benevolent patriarchical deity.
The Norse peoples (who definitely had some influence on Beowulf since it's set largely in Daneland of all places) had Odin. The Germanic people had Woden. The Anglo-Saxon creators or audience for this poem were themselves Germanic.
So who's to say that these generic references to god aren't to these pagan gods? The Geats and Danes aren't exactly quoting Old or New Testament verses at each other. Though there is that lengthy reference to Grendel as the kin of Cain and god's war with the giants. That could be a reference to the apparently standard stories told among the peoples of northern Europe about unexplored places.
Knowing with certainty who the deity is that's constantly being referred to is an impossibility. But the idea that it could be either the Christian god or one of the chief Pagan gods isn't just a neat alternative. That could well have been the intention.
No matter where you place our version of Beowulf's composition within the 400 year window generally agreed upon (between 600 and 1000 AD) contemporary Christianity had yet to really spread over all of Europe. As such this story that's ostensibly about a hero's quests and fights with the supernatural could have been used as a way to infiltrate and convert.
Or, any male deity could be read into it as a way of making sure that the epic simply wasn't too preachy.
Beowulf's being bundled with a collection of fantastic tales from the east in the Noel codex could in fact be the book creator's way of sort of sweeping it under the rug because these god references weren't clear then either. That book maker would have been a Christian monk of some sort or another after all.
So, when you're reading Beowulf and come across a reference to the "alwalda" don't just think surfer dude with a long white robe and beard, but think one-eyed, helmeted warrior god, too.
Back To Top
Closing
Next week, the Geats step into Heorot and duly unequip themselves.
Back To Top
Translation
Recordings
A boastful coastguard?
Meet the new god, same as the old god
Closing
Back To Top
Abstract
The coastguard takes his leave of the Geats, wishing them god's protection.
Back To Top
Translation
"He took the battle brave to the bright
high-souled hall, that he may thither them
go; that hero of combat turned his horse
about, spoke he these words next:
'It is time for me to go. The almighty
father's grace keep you healthy
amidst your quest! I am to the sea,
to hold the shore against fiendish foes.'"
(Beowulf ll.312-319)
Back To Top
Recordings
Old English:
{Forthcoming}
Modern English:
{Forthcoming}
Back To Top
A boastful coastguard?
The coastguard's being called "hero of combat" ("guðbeorna") seems strange. That is, until you notice that it's the third word in an alliterative sequence. But is it only there to hold up a preferred Old English poetic form?
Yeah, probably.
I mean, the coastguard does mention that he has to go back to the coast to guard against "fiendish foes" ("wrað werod" (l.319)). So there could be some verity to his being a "hero of combat." But that term seems a little inflated to me.
Could the poet be having a laugh at the coastguard's expense? "guðbeorna" fit the line that he had written and so he just ran with that and made the coastguard into a bit of a boaster at the end of his speech?
Maybe.
I mean, on the one hand, as much of an exile such a person might feel (even if he does have a crew out there), it definitely wouldn't be wise to send some fop out to guard your coast.
The Danes wouldn't have had the troops to keep a barracks there or anything like that. His crew included, the Danish coastguard in Beowulf probably wouldn't exceed ten men. Tops. So he, the lead coastguard if you will, would definitely need to have proven his mettle in combat.
Though, it's also possible that the position of coastguard is reserved for warriors who are past their prime. No longer able to perform as vigourously on the battlefield they're charged to put their skills and battle-sharpened wits to the test in judging new comers and putting on a fearsome face. With a coast as quiet as the Dane's must be (who, aside from heroes would want to come to a monster-terrorized-golden-hall party?), the job of coastguard definitely seems like something that would get filled by a veteran.
And maybe that's what the poet was going for with the narrative riff on the coastguard's past and then his own seemingly over-zealous admission of what he was heading off to do.
Back To Top
Meet the new god, same as the old god
Throughout Beowulf, people give thanks to a generic male, father god. Many translations (and some instances in the original text) make many of these references into "lord." As such, it's very easy to read these instances of reference to god as references to the Christian god. Since "lord" is frequently used as a deific pronoun in Christianity.
However.
Christianity wasn't the only religion to have a wise, solemn, wrathful, and benevolent patriarchical deity.
The Norse peoples (who definitely had some influence on Beowulf since it's set largely in Daneland of all places) had Odin. The Germanic people had Woden. The Anglo-Saxon creators or audience for this poem were themselves Germanic.
So who's to say that these generic references to god aren't to these pagan gods? The Geats and Danes aren't exactly quoting Old or New Testament verses at each other. Though there is that lengthy reference to Grendel as the kin of Cain and god's war with the giants. That could be a reference to the apparently standard stories told among the peoples of northern Europe about unexplored places.
Knowing with certainty who the deity is that's constantly being referred to is an impossibility. But the idea that it could be either the Christian god or one of the chief Pagan gods isn't just a neat alternative. That could well have been the intention.
No matter where you place our version of Beowulf's composition within the 400 year window generally agreed upon (between 600 and 1000 AD) contemporary Christianity had yet to really spread over all of Europe. As such this story that's ostensibly about a hero's quests and fights with the supernatural could have been used as a way to infiltrate and convert.
Or, any male deity could be read into it as a way of making sure that the epic simply wasn't too preachy.
Beowulf's being bundled with a collection of fantastic tales from the east in the Noel codex could in fact be the book creator's way of sort of sweeping it under the rug because these god references weren't clear then either. That book maker would have been a Christian monk of some sort or another after all.
So, when you're reading Beowulf and come across a reference to the "alwalda" don't just think surfer dude with a long white robe and beard, but think one-eyed, helmeted warrior god, too.
Back To Top
Closing
Next week, the Geats step into Heorot and duly unequip themselves.
Back To Top
Thursday, March 20, 2014
Speculation along the way to Heorot (ll.301-311) [Old English]
Abstract
Translation
Recordings
Gold as guardian
Of ships and mothers
Closing
Back To Top
Abstract
The coastguard leads Beowulf and his entourage to Heorot.
Back To Top
Translation
"They went upon their way. The boat was bound,
the capacious craft tethered with cord,
secure at anchor. Boar-shapes shone
atop their cheek guards; ornamented gold,
glistening and firmament firm, securely held life:
war-hearted grim men. They all hurried onward,
going down together, until from that high hall of a building,
ornamented and gold-dappled for all to see
that it was foremost among humanity of all
the buildings beneath heaven, the ruler called for them;
light of the people over so great a land."
(Beowulf ll.301-311)
Back To Top
Recordings
Old English:
{Forthcoming}
Modern English:
{Forthcoming}
Back To Top
Gold as guardian
Gold is pretty prevalent in this passage. It'd be easy just to dismiss the metal's shining presence in the Geats' helmets and on Heorot as indicators of wealth and prestige, but I think there's more to it than that. Of course.
In both of these instances I think that the gold is present in the helmet and the hall as a ward against harm. Or maybe as an outward show of the value of the people under the helmets and in the hall.
Putting a monetary value on a life or a major injury isn't something modern. The Anglo-Saxons had a law covering the same thing that required the perpetrator to pay their victim (or, in the case of murder, the victim's next of kin) a fee called "wergild." The major purpose of this fee was to stem the outbreak of feuds and to bring disparate groups together into a group that extended beyond family ties.
It's a bit broad, but literally translated, "wergild" becomes "man price."
This is where this theory gets a little crazy, mostly because of timing issues. If the concept of we-gild had been around for a few generations before Beowulf was put together/originally written, then what would stop payments from becoming a preventative measure? Once it was so established, it's not much further to get to a point where the association of gold with prevention of harm takes on a magical or superstitious flavour.
With such perception of gold as a protective metal in the culture, it would make good sense for it to adorn helmet and horn alike. Thus, pointing out the gold in the helmets and in Heorot's exterior firmly establishes the protective properties of both.
However, in this passage, I think that a contrast is implied.
If gold is a metal that the Anglo-Saxons of Beowulf's time believed to have protective properties then it's already clear to the audience that it hasn't worked so well for Heorot. The mention of gold being in the Geats' helmets, then, calls into question just how effective they'll be in guarding their lives. It's also possible to read the failure of Heorot's golden exterior as evidence for Grendel's chaotic influence. His presence as a kin of Cain causes the proper function of gold to cease.
If all of this rang true for the poem's original audience, then it's hard to believe how much more anticipation there would have been for the fight once Beowulf reveals that he'll faced Grendel completely unarmed. Heck, you could even say that if all this is true and Grendel's power to negate weapons extends to negating the protective properties of gold, then Beowulf's facing him with his bare hands alone evens the field all the more.
Back To Top
Of ships and mothers
"Capacious" of line 302 is, in Old English, "wide-bosomed," or "sidfæþmed."
While a modern interpretation of "wide-bosomed" might be simply "large breasted," the two definitions of "sidfæþmed" suggest that the Anglo-Saxons regarded it as more a matter of volume than size. Considering that all children of the period were nursed, this is hardly surprising. The greater capacity a mother had for milk the more nourishment her child would get, giving that child a better chance to make it through childhood and come into healthy adolescence.
How that relates to a ship is beyond me, except for the idea that travelling in comfort is better than travelling in a cramped space. Plus, a boat with some room would make rowing much easier. Easier rowing means faster travel. So a capacious boat is definitely optimal.
Getting back to this passage in particular, what can be made of the repeat mentions of Beowulf's boat being securely tethered?
Running with the connection between mothers and boats via "sidfæþmed," and taking along for the jog the tradition of referring to boats with feminine pronouns, Beowulf's boat could be regarded as his anima being securely left behind, enabling him to act without sentiment, if necessary. If you want to take the Jungian tack.
Much more straightforward is the interpretation that Beowulf's ship is his only means of getting him back to his homeland. As such, its security is of the utmost importance.
Or, it could symbolize his identity as a true Geat. If he had no way of getting back home, his liege Hygelac could think him dead or gone native, erasing his status as outsider among the Danes and making him a quasi-exile.
Back To Top
Closing
Next week, the coastguard takes the Geats to Heorot's doors and then takes his leave.
Back To Top
Translation
Recordings
Gold as guardian
Of ships and mothers
Closing
Back To Top
Abstract
The coastguard leads Beowulf and his entourage to Heorot.
Back To Top
Translation
"They went upon their way. The boat was bound,
the capacious craft tethered with cord,
secure at anchor. Boar-shapes shone
atop their cheek guards; ornamented gold,
glistening and firmament firm, securely held life:
war-hearted grim men. They all hurried onward,
going down together, until from that high hall of a building,
ornamented and gold-dappled for all to see
that it was foremost among humanity of all
the buildings beneath heaven, the ruler called for them;
light of the people over so great a land."
(Beowulf ll.301-311)
Back To Top
Recordings
Old English:
{Forthcoming}
Modern English:
{Forthcoming}
Back To Top
Gold as guardian
Gold is pretty prevalent in this passage. It'd be easy just to dismiss the metal's shining presence in the Geats' helmets and on Heorot as indicators of wealth and prestige, but I think there's more to it than that. Of course.
In both of these instances I think that the gold is present in the helmet and the hall as a ward against harm. Or maybe as an outward show of the value of the people under the helmets and in the hall.
Putting a monetary value on a life or a major injury isn't something modern. The Anglo-Saxons had a law covering the same thing that required the perpetrator to pay their victim (or, in the case of murder, the victim's next of kin) a fee called "wergild." The major purpose of this fee was to stem the outbreak of feuds and to bring disparate groups together into a group that extended beyond family ties.
It's a bit broad, but literally translated, "wergild" becomes "man price."
This is where this theory gets a little crazy, mostly because of timing issues. If the concept of we-gild had been around for a few generations before Beowulf was put together/originally written, then what would stop payments from becoming a preventative measure? Once it was so established, it's not much further to get to a point where the association of gold with prevention of harm takes on a magical or superstitious flavour.
With such perception of gold as a protective metal in the culture, it would make good sense for it to adorn helmet and horn alike. Thus, pointing out the gold in the helmets and in Heorot's exterior firmly establishes the protective properties of both.
However, in this passage, I think that a contrast is implied.
If gold is a metal that the Anglo-Saxons of Beowulf's time believed to have protective properties then it's already clear to the audience that it hasn't worked so well for Heorot. The mention of gold being in the Geats' helmets, then, calls into question just how effective they'll be in guarding their lives. It's also possible to read the failure of Heorot's golden exterior as evidence for Grendel's chaotic influence. His presence as a kin of Cain causes the proper function of gold to cease.
If all of this rang true for the poem's original audience, then it's hard to believe how much more anticipation there would have been for the fight once Beowulf reveals that he'll faced Grendel completely unarmed. Heck, you could even say that if all this is true and Grendel's power to negate weapons extends to negating the protective properties of gold, then Beowulf's facing him with his bare hands alone evens the field all the more.
Back To Top
Of ships and mothers
"Capacious" of line 302 is, in Old English, "wide-bosomed," or "sidfæþmed."
While a modern interpretation of "wide-bosomed" might be simply "large breasted," the two definitions of "sidfæþmed" suggest that the Anglo-Saxons regarded it as more a matter of volume than size. Considering that all children of the period were nursed, this is hardly surprising. The greater capacity a mother had for milk the more nourishment her child would get, giving that child a better chance to make it through childhood and come into healthy adolescence.
How that relates to a ship is beyond me, except for the idea that travelling in comfort is better than travelling in a cramped space. Plus, a boat with some room would make rowing much easier. Easier rowing means faster travel. So a capacious boat is definitely optimal.
Getting back to this passage in particular, what can be made of the repeat mentions of Beowulf's boat being securely tethered?
Running with the connection between mothers and boats via "sidfæþmed," and taking along for the jog the tradition of referring to boats with feminine pronouns, Beowulf's boat could be regarded as his anima being securely left behind, enabling him to act without sentiment, if necessary. If you want to take the Jungian tack.
Much more straightforward is the interpretation that Beowulf's ship is his only means of getting him back to his homeland. As such, its security is of the utmost importance.
Or, it could symbolize his identity as a true Geat. If he had no way of getting back home, his liege Hygelac could think him dead or gone native, erasing his status as outsider among the Danes and making him a quasi-exile.
Back To Top
Closing
Next week, the coastguard takes the Geats to Heorot's doors and then takes his leave.
Back To Top
Thursday, March 13, 2014
The coastguard's reply (Pt. 2) (ll.293-300) [Old English]
Abstract
Translation
Recordings
The coastguard's prayer
Two matters
Closing
Back To Top
Abstract
The coastguard makes Beowulf a promise, and wishes him well.
Back To Top
Translation
"'Also I'll command my men
to guard your boat against the fiend,
relate a request to guard your newly tarred
ship on the shore, until it again bears
you dear men over the streaming surface
in its bound boards to the Geat's borders:
that such a doer of good may have that fate,
to survive the battle rush in the hall.'"
(Beowulf ll.293-300)
Back To Top
Recordings
Old English:
{Forthcoming}
Modern English:
{Forthcoming}
Back To Top
The coastguard's prayer
A coastguard promising to command his underlings to watch someone's ship until their return sounds like a pretty routine part of a coastguard's job. It could just be what coastguards say to those with whom they interact. But here, in the context of Beowulf's fateful arrival in Daneland, it feels like there's more to the coastguard's words than a professional nicety.
The final two lines of this extract are spent wishing Beowulf luck against Grendel, why could that well wish not be extended further back to the extract's very beginning on line 293?
Taken as a whole, those last two lines definitely fit in with the rest of this part of the coastguard's reply.
The extract opens with the coastguard promising to command his men to guard Beowulf's ship until his return and departure.
This is a crux.
It's not that they'll watch his boat until his return - they'll keep his boat until his return and until he leaves Daneland. That the promise covers that much time, and is described in that way, suggests that the coastguard has some confidence in this new challenger.
Though, Beowulf's return to his ship could be as a corpse (something that's touched on further into the poem). In that scenario, if that is what the coastguard has in mind, then there is likely little confidence in the man's tone and delivery. But a whole two lines are spent on the final section of this reply, something that I regard as a prayer, or at the very least, an invocation.
Again, this part of the coastguard's reply doesn't really directly refer to Beowulf. However, there's a slight sarcasm in this section: Rather than "Beowulf" he says "such a doer of good" ("godfremmendra swylcum" (l.299)).
Whether or not Beowulf will indeed do any good has yet to be seen, so I think that the coastguard's referring to Beowulf as such is a way for him to acknowledge the hope he has for Beowulf while also declining to fully embrace this hope. He's likely seen too many other heroes come and fail before.
Combined with his promise, this guarded expression of hope makes this part of the coastguard's reply into one long wish of luck. In that sense, it's like a prayer, a focused statement meant to bring into being the hypothetical situation that it proposes (Beowulf's doing good and returning alive).
Back To Top
Two matters
Two little things here.
First, on line 295, the reference to Beowulf's boat as "newly tarred" makes it clear that Beowulf's boat is a really nice boat. After all, tarring was a means of waterproofing and so a newly tarred boat is one in the best state of repair. Though, being newly tarred could imply one of two things.
A boat might have just had a new coat of tar put on it, patching up all of the holes accumulated over years of sailing.
Or, a boat may have been newly tarred because it is itself a new boat.
Like Beowulf in truth, his boat could be a very new boat, something inexperienced and in need of some actual experience of the real world.
The other little thing is the word "lagu-streamas" ("streaming surface" (l.297)).
This combination of "surface" ("lagu") and "streaming" ("streamas") gives quite the insight into the Anglo-Saxon view of the ocean. It implies a great depth to the ocean, since it is just the surface that a boat travels along.
Compare that with the modern English means of describing sailing being things like "going out on the water," and the same sense sort of lives on but is really not as pronounced. For "lagu-streamas" also carries implications of only the surface of the ocean being in motion, the rest of it left mysterious and impenetrable.
Back To Top
Closing
Beowulf and his fellow Geats are taken to Heorot next week - watch for it!
Back To Top
Translation
Recordings
The coastguard's prayer
Two matters
Closing
Back To Top
Abstract
The coastguard makes Beowulf a promise, and wishes him well.
Back To Top
Translation
"'Also I'll command my men
to guard your boat against the fiend,
relate a request to guard your newly tarred
ship on the shore, until it again bears
you dear men over the streaming surface
in its bound boards to the Geat's borders:
that such a doer of good may have that fate,
to survive the battle rush in the hall.'"
(Beowulf ll.293-300)
Back To Top
Recordings
Old English:
{Forthcoming}
Modern English:
{Forthcoming}
Back To Top
The coastguard's prayer
A coastguard promising to command his underlings to watch someone's ship until their return sounds like a pretty routine part of a coastguard's job. It could just be what coastguards say to those with whom they interact. But here, in the context of Beowulf's fateful arrival in Daneland, it feels like there's more to the coastguard's words than a professional nicety.
The final two lines of this extract are spent wishing Beowulf luck against Grendel, why could that well wish not be extended further back to the extract's very beginning on line 293?
Taken as a whole, those last two lines definitely fit in with the rest of this part of the coastguard's reply.
The extract opens with the coastguard promising to command his men to guard Beowulf's ship until his return and departure.
This is a crux.
It's not that they'll watch his boat until his return - they'll keep his boat until his return and until he leaves Daneland. That the promise covers that much time, and is described in that way, suggests that the coastguard has some confidence in this new challenger.
Though, Beowulf's return to his ship could be as a corpse (something that's touched on further into the poem). In that scenario, if that is what the coastguard has in mind, then there is likely little confidence in the man's tone and delivery. But a whole two lines are spent on the final section of this reply, something that I regard as a prayer, or at the very least, an invocation.
Again, this part of the coastguard's reply doesn't really directly refer to Beowulf. However, there's a slight sarcasm in this section: Rather than "Beowulf" he says "such a doer of good" ("godfremmendra swylcum" (l.299)).
Whether or not Beowulf will indeed do any good has yet to be seen, so I think that the coastguard's referring to Beowulf as such is a way for him to acknowledge the hope he has for Beowulf while also declining to fully embrace this hope. He's likely seen too many other heroes come and fail before.
Combined with his promise, this guarded expression of hope makes this part of the coastguard's reply into one long wish of luck. In that sense, it's like a prayer, a focused statement meant to bring into being the hypothetical situation that it proposes (Beowulf's doing good and returning alive).
Back To Top
Two matters
Two little things here.
First, on line 295, the reference to Beowulf's boat as "newly tarred" makes it clear that Beowulf's boat is a really nice boat. After all, tarring was a means of waterproofing and so a newly tarred boat is one in the best state of repair. Though, being newly tarred could imply one of two things.
A boat might have just had a new coat of tar put on it, patching up all of the holes accumulated over years of sailing.
Or, a boat may have been newly tarred because it is itself a new boat.
Like Beowulf in truth, his boat could be a very new boat, something inexperienced and in need of some actual experience of the real world.
The other little thing is the word "lagu-streamas" ("streaming surface" (l.297)).
This combination of "surface" ("lagu") and "streaming" ("streamas") gives quite the insight into the Anglo-Saxon view of the ocean. It implies a great depth to the ocean, since it is just the surface that a boat travels along.
Compare that with the modern English means of describing sailing being things like "going out on the water," and the same sense sort of lives on but is really not as pronounced. For "lagu-streamas" also carries implications of only the surface of the ocean being in motion, the rest of it left mysterious and impenetrable.
Back To Top
Closing
Beowulf and his fellow Geats are taken to Heorot next week - watch for it!
Back To Top
Thursday, March 6, 2014
The coastguard's reply (Pt.1) (ll. 286-292) [Old English]
Abstract
Translation
Recordings
Enter a horse
The coastguard's backstory?
Closing
Back To Top
Abstract
The coastguard answers Beowulf, and passes judgement on what the Geat has told him.
Back To Top
Translation
"The guard spoke, there astride his horse,
the fearless officer: 'Everyone shall
come to know and understand your sharp skill,
words and deeds, as they shall determine.
I hear this, that this warrior is true
to the Scylding lord. Come forth bearing
your weapons and armour; I will lead you:'"
(Beowulf ll.286-292)
Back To Top
Recordings
Old English:
{Forthcoming}
Modern English:
{Forthcoming}
Back To Top
Enter a horse
In the run up to the coastguard's speech we're told that he's on horseback.
This little fact might seem something strange to include before a speech, but I think there's a practical side to doing so. The most obvious benefit to the coastguard being that while on horseback he would be able to project his voice much more effectively than if he were on foot.
The sense that I get from the poet/scribe's having thrown this reference in, though, is that it would have been taken for granted that the coastguard would be ahorse and that is why it's not mentioned until now. After all, it would be kind of difficult to effectively guard a coast on foot. You'd just be too slow.
But then, was it only mentioned now to fill out the poetic meter, or was it only mentioned now to emphasize and remind the audience that the speaker here is in a position of power, of authority? Being ahorse, the coastguard is placed in authority over Beowulf - quite literally.
If this horse is mentioned for emphasis, then it bears directly on what the coastguard says. Specifically line 290, on which the guard restates what he has heard. It makes the guard's judgement of Beowulf as being true in his words, and to be put to the test in front of the rest of the Danes a true one within the court of the coast.
If it's a matter of meter, though, then the poet/scribe's choice says a lot about the contemporary conception of poetry.
Let's say that to the original audience, the coastguard was, of course, on horseback. The mention of that fact brings that fact into high relief. Mentioning the horse, draws it out of the scene that the poet has already evoked so far and places it at the fore of the audience's attention.
Back To Top
The coastguard's backstory?
Related to the coastguard's being on horseback, he, like any gatekeeper, plays a filtering role among the Danes. In his reply to Beowulf he specifically mentions that "Everyone shall/come to know and understand your sharp skill" ("æghwæþres sceal/scearp scyldwiga gescad witan" (l.287b-288)). Yet he was the one to know Beowulf first. It was he that gave Beowulf admittance into the Dane's land on his word as a warrior and destroyer of fiends.
The question I'm left with after this passage, though, is who is this man to arbitrate for the whole of Hrothgar's folk?
It's easy to dismiss a lone coastguard as some sort of near cast out who somehow wound up with the short straw when the guards were pulling for their positions. But he's the one who checks everyone's character before they're admitted into the land. He must have some importance, or he must in some way be an extension of Hrothgar. Perhaps in his younger days he fought alongside the Danish king. Or the position of coastguard is one of two branches of promotion - the other of equal esteem being Hrothgar's comitatus.
Whatever he was, he is now the coastguard. And his position as arbiter of taste has just admitted a gang of warriors into the land.
Back To Top
Closing
Next week the coastguard finishes his speech.
Back To Top
Translation
Recordings
Enter a horse
The coastguard's backstory?
Closing
Back To Top
Abstract
The coastguard answers Beowulf, and passes judgement on what the Geat has told him.
Back To Top
Translation
"The guard spoke, there astride his horse,
the fearless officer: 'Everyone shall
come to know and understand your sharp skill,
words and deeds, as they shall determine.
I hear this, that this warrior is true
to the Scylding lord. Come forth bearing
your weapons and armour; I will lead you:'"
(Beowulf ll.286-292)
Back To Top
Recordings
Old English:
{Forthcoming}
Modern English:
{Forthcoming}
Back To Top
Enter a horse
In the run up to the coastguard's speech we're told that he's on horseback.
This little fact might seem something strange to include before a speech, but I think there's a practical side to doing so. The most obvious benefit to the coastguard being that while on horseback he would be able to project his voice much more effectively than if he were on foot.
The sense that I get from the poet/scribe's having thrown this reference in, though, is that it would have been taken for granted that the coastguard would be ahorse and that is why it's not mentioned until now. After all, it would be kind of difficult to effectively guard a coast on foot. You'd just be too slow.
But then, was it only mentioned now to fill out the poetic meter, or was it only mentioned now to emphasize and remind the audience that the speaker here is in a position of power, of authority? Being ahorse, the coastguard is placed in authority over Beowulf - quite literally.
If this horse is mentioned for emphasis, then it bears directly on what the coastguard says. Specifically line 290, on which the guard restates what he has heard. It makes the guard's judgement of Beowulf as being true in his words, and to be put to the test in front of the rest of the Danes a true one within the court of the coast.
If it's a matter of meter, though, then the poet/scribe's choice says a lot about the contemporary conception of poetry.
Let's say that to the original audience, the coastguard was, of course, on horseback. The mention of that fact brings that fact into high relief. Mentioning the horse, draws it out of the scene that the poet has already evoked so far and places it at the fore of the audience's attention.
Back To Top
The coastguard's backstory?
Related to the coastguard's being on horseback, he, like any gatekeeper, plays a filtering role among the Danes. In his reply to Beowulf he specifically mentions that "Everyone shall/come to know and understand your sharp skill" ("æghwæþres sceal/scearp scyldwiga gescad witan" (l.287b-288)). Yet he was the one to know Beowulf first. It was he that gave Beowulf admittance into the Dane's land on his word as a warrior and destroyer of fiends.
The question I'm left with after this passage, though, is who is this man to arbitrate for the whole of Hrothgar's folk?
It's easy to dismiss a lone coastguard as some sort of near cast out who somehow wound up with the short straw when the guards were pulling for their positions. But he's the one who checks everyone's character before they're admitted into the land. He must have some importance, or he must in some way be an extension of Hrothgar. Perhaps in his younger days he fought alongside the Danish king. Or the position of coastguard is one of two branches of promotion - the other of equal esteem being Hrothgar's comitatus.
Whatever he was, he is now the coastguard. And his position as arbiter of taste has just admitted a gang of warriors into the land.
Back To Top
Closing
Next week the coastguard finishes his speech.
Back To Top
Thursday, February 27, 2014
Beowulf's promise (ll.277b-285) [Old English]
Abstract
Translation
Recordings
Beowulf's Ultimatum
Cooling cares
Closing
Back To Top
Abstract
Beowulf concludes his speech to the Danish coastguard.
Back To Top
Translation
"'That I might teach Hrothgar
through the counsel of a broad mind,
how he the wise and good could overcome that fiend --
if he ever should end
this ruinous trouble, relief will come after --
and his cares shall turn cool;
Else ever after shall be times of sorrow,
endure distress, all while that greatest
of houses is forced to make do in its high place.'"
(Beowulf ll.277b-285)
Back To Top
Recordings
Old English:
{Forthcoming}
Modern English:
{Forthcoming}
Back To Top
Beowulf's Ultimatum
So here's the final piece of Beowulf's speech. He's introduced himself, spoken about his mission, and stated that he is the one that can kill Grendel. But there's something strange about his phrasing.
Line 283 starts with the harsh conjunction "else" ("oððe a syþðan"). I call it a harsh conjunction because "else" always indicates a sharp turn in topic and tone. The phrase "or else" is so dramatic that contemporary culture's love of irony has made it fodder for comedy, but "oððe" wasn't something to take lightly back in the day.
I've translated the phrase "oððe a syþðan" as "else" because such is the simplest way to do so.
Looked at literally, a translation would be "and/until forever afterward." Using "and" rather than "until" gives the same sense as "else" since it still indicates a sharp turn away from what was said before. Even so, there's not really any other way to take the phrase "until forever afterward," than "else"; what better word is there to convey something that will happen until the time "forever" is reached?
So, getting back to Beowulf's phrasing. It seems that the conclusion to his speech is as much a boast as it is a statement of fact. But that's important, here.
As Beowulf is speaking the coastguard is measuring him up against the terror of Grendel. Ending on what is really an ultimatum shows that Beowulf can be a match to that terror. For what could be more terrifying than to be told that if this latest of many wishing to attempt a daring feat can't accomplish it no one can?
Thus, Beowulf's phrasing is certainly intentional and persuasive. It shows that Beowulf knows about the others who have come before him and uses this knowledge to his advantage.
Such an ultimatum wouldn't work if he was the first to come challenge Grendel. But, since many have tried and failed before him, his threat that he is the Danes' final hope is much more believable. It could even be that the line of hopeful heroes has dwindled down to nothing of late, and Beowulf is the first to be seen for some time, making Beowulf's threat/boast all the more effective.
Back To Top
Cooling cares
Care and the heart go hand in hand. Poetically, at least.
And the heart is poetically linked to temperature. Kind people are warm hearted, misers are cold hearted. Fear can be described as having your blood run cold and if you find yourself in anger's grasp some might say the very blood in your veins is boiling.
However, on line 282, Beowulf uses an image that suggests that care itself once had some connection to temperature.
"And his cares shall turn cool" ("ond þa cear-wylmas colran wurðaþ").
That Beowulf notes that he can cool the cares of Hrothgar shows, once again, his knowledge of the situation.
Sure, Grendel is definitely foremost among Hrothgar's cares, but going beyond stating that he'll simply kill the monster that's terrorizing the Danes really makes it clear that Beowulf isn't looking for glory alone.
Keeping in mind the fact that the people that he is here to help really makes it clear that he can and will keep their interests in mind. He will respect their customs and regard their ways as he strives to maintain them.
Closing the positive possibility of his defeating Grendel with the image of cooling the Danes' cares is really quite powerful. It shows Beowulf's concern with the effect of his success as well as the mission itself.
Back To Top
Closing
Next week, the coastguard gives Beowulf his answer.
Back To Top
Translation
Recordings
Beowulf's Ultimatum
Cooling cares
Closing
Back To Top
Abstract
Beowulf concludes his speech to the Danish coastguard.
Back To Top
Translation
"'That I might teach Hrothgar
through the counsel of a broad mind,
how he the wise and good could overcome that fiend --
if he ever should end
this ruinous trouble, relief will come after --
and his cares shall turn cool;
Else ever after shall be times of sorrow,
endure distress, all while that greatest
of houses is forced to make do in its high place.'"
(Beowulf ll.277b-285)
Back To Top
Recordings
Old English:
{Forthcoming}
Modern English:
{Forthcoming}
Back To Top
Beowulf's Ultimatum
So here's the final piece of Beowulf's speech. He's introduced himself, spoken about his mission, and stated that he is the one that can kill Grendel. But there's something strange about his phrasing.
Line 283 starts with the harsh conjunction "else" ("oððe a syþðan"). I call it a harsh conjunction because "else" always indicates a sharp turn in topic and tone. The phrase "or else" is so dramatic that contemporary culture's love of irony has made it fodder for comedy, but "oððe" wasn't something to take lightly back in the day.
I've translated the phrase "oððe a syþðan" as "else" because such is the simplest way to do so.
Looked at literally, a translation would be "and/until forever afterward." Using "and" rather than "until" gives the same sense as "else" since it still indicates a sharp turn away from what was said before. Even so, there's not really any other way to take the phrase "until forever afterward," than "else"; what better word is there to convey something that will happen until the time "forever" is reached?
So, getting back to Beowulf's phrasing. It seems that the conclusion to his speech is as much a boast as it is a statement of fact. But that's important, here.
As Beowulf is speaking the coastguard is measuring him up against the terror of Grendel. Ending on what is really an ultimatum shows that Beowulf can be a match to that terror. For what could be more terrifying than to be told that if this latest of many wishing to attempt a daring feat can't accomplish it no one can?
Thus, Beowulf's phrasing is certainly intentional and persuasive. It shows that Beowulf knows about the others who have come before him and uses this knowledge to his advantage.
Such an ultimatum wouldn't work if he was the first to come challenge Grendel. But, since many have tried and failed before him, his threat that he is the Danes' final hope is much more believable. It could even be that the line of hopeful heroes has dwindled down to nothing of late, and Beowulf is the first to be seen for some time, making Beowulf's threat/boast all the more effective.
Back To Top
Cooling cares
Care and the heart go hand in hand. Poetically, at least.
And the heart is poetically linked to temperature. Kind people are warm hearted, misers are cold hearted. Fear can be described as having your blood run cold and if you find yourself in anger's grasp some might say the very blood in your veins is boiling.
However, on line 282, Beowulf uses an image that suggests that care itself once had some connection to temperature.
"And his cares shall turn cool" ("ond þa cear-wylmas colran wurðaþ").
That Beowulf notes that he can cool the cares of Hrothgar shows, once again, his knowledge of the situation.
Sure, Grendel is definitely foremost among Hrothgar's cares, but going beyond stating that he'll simply kill the monster that's terrorizing the Danes really makes it clear that Beowulf isn't looking for glory alone.
Keeping in mind the fact that the people that he is here to help really makes it clear that he can and will keep their interests in mind. He will respect their customs and regard their ways as he strives to maintain them.
Closing the positive possibility of his defeating Grendel with the image of cooling the Danes' cares is really quite powerful. It shows Beowulf's concern with the effect of his success as well as the mission itself.
Back To Top
Closing
Next week, the coastguard gives Beowulf his answer.
Back To Top
Sunday, February 23, 2014
On words of evil and Beowulf's cover letter (ll.270-277a) [Old English]
Abstract
Translation
Recordings
Words of evil
Beowulf and cover letter writing
Closing
Back To Top
Abstract
Beowulf introduces the problem he's come to Daneland to solve.
Back To Top
Translation
"'We have much to declare towards your errand,
the freedom of the Danes, no longer shall there evil
be, this I believe. You know - if it is
truly as we have heard -
that against the Scyldings fights a fiend unknown to me,
a thriving ravager, that in the dark of night
threatens you with unknowable fear,
oppression and slaughter.'"
(Beowulf ll.270-277a)
Back To Top
Recordings
Old English:
{Forthcoming}
Modern English:
{Forthcoming}
Back To Top
Words of evil
Line 275 of this passage suggests a pattern in Old English words. Those starting with the letter "d" are more often than not related to evil or, that intention's favoured cover, darkness.
The words that suggest this pattern are "deogol" ("unknown"), "daed-hata" ("ravager"), "deorcum" ("dark of"). In a passage containing roughly 50 words, four may not seem like a lot, but what's important here is that these words were chosen for their alliterative properties.
Now, bringing the poem's use of alliteration into an argument about the meaning of the poem's words might seem backwards.
Calling attention to the fact that Beowulf is written alliteratively can remind people that its words aren't necessarily chosen for their meaning, after all. But, my point in doing so is to also remind readers that any single word in a line of Old English poetry could be used for alliteration. The fact that line 275 contains three words that are linked by both alliteration and connotation seems far too coincidental to be anything but intentional.
So what can be said about this combination of words relating to evil and darkness?
Well, first off, that they're related concepts in the Old English mind.
Further, that since the Old English perception of colour is more about lustre than shade, these words show the association of darkness and evil at work. Dark colours, those lacking lustre, are still regarded as being more dire than their brighter counterparts, just as they would have been regarded during the time that Beowulf strives to capture.
Putting these three things together also establishes Grendel, the subject of this line, as being utterly separate from god. To the Anglo-Saxons, god was a concept of light and intricate patterns (both things negated by such darkness). That his utterance implies an understanding of this association also marks Beowulf as a rather smooth talker, one who can turn a memorable phrase as well as parry and riposte a well timed strike.
Back To Top
Beowulf and cover letter writing
Speaking of Beowulf as well-spoken. This section of his speech to the coastguard fits very nicely into a rhetorical outline of his speech as a whole.
The previous section of his speech was all about his introduction. That section established who Beowulf is as a person and where he stands in relation to the hierarchy of power. That is, he's related to Ecgtheow, who had helped the Danes previously, he's in the service of Hygelac, a famed warrior, and has accomplished deeds of renown in the past.
This week's section has him move from that self-introduction to an explanation of why he (and his crew) have come to Daneland. Although the coastguard would already be well-versed in the troubles of his people, Beowulf's stating the problem (before running through his ability to solve it next week), establishes that he is familiar with said problem. Thus, Beowulf offers the coastguard a view onto his own understanding of what it is he is here to help with.
Rhetorically speaking, this sort of complete introductory speech is still used today.
Unless I've been doing it wrong this whole time, the classic cover letter follows a relatively similar format. You introduce yourself, state the purpose of your application, and then why you're a good fit for the job to which you're applying. The biggest difference between this staple of serious job applications and Beowulf's speech is that instead of explicitly describing the job you're applying for, you implicitly do so in the skills and experiences that you emphasize in your cover letter.
Boasts are also sometimes a shared feature between Anglo-Saxon discourse and cover letter writing. But we won't see any of those in Beowulf until this coming week's extract.
Back To Top
Closing
Check back here on Thursday for the third part of Beowulf's introductory speech. In it he claims to be able to solve all the Danes' problems.
Back To Top
Translation
Recordings
Words of evil
Beowulf and cover letter writing
Closing
Back To Top
Abstract
Beowulf introduces the problem he's come to Daneland to solve.
Back To Top
Translation
"'We have much to declare towards your errand,
the freedom of the Danes, no longer shall there evil
be, this I believe. You know - if it is
truly as we have heard -
that against the Scyldings fights a fiend unknown to me,
a thriving ravager, that in the dark of night
threatens you with unknowable fear,
oppression and slaughter.'"
(Beowulf ll.270-277a)
Back To Top
Recordings
Old English:
{Forthcoming}
Modern English:
{Forthcoming}
Back To Top
Words of evil
Line 275 of this passage suggests a pattern in Old English words. Those starting with the letter "d" are more often than not related to evil or, that intention's favoured cover, darkness.
The words that suggest this pattern are "deogol" ("unknown"), "daed-hata" ("ravager"), "deorcum" ("dark of"). In a passage containing roughly 50 words, four may not seem like a lot, but what's important here is that these words were chosen for their alliterative properties.
Now, bringing the poem's use of alliteration into an argument about the meaning of the poem's words might seem backwards.
Calling attention to the fact that Beowulf is written alliteratively can remind people that its words aren't necessarily chosen for their meaning, after all. But, my point in doing so is to also remind readers that any single word in a line of Old English poetry could be used for alliteration. The fact that line 275 contains three words that are linked by both alliteration and connotation seems far too coincidental to be anything but intentional.
So what can be said about this combination of words relating to evil and darkness?
Well, first off, that they're related concepts in the Old English mind.
Further, that since the Old English perception of colour is more about lustre than shade, these words show the association of darkness and evil at work. Dark colours, those lacking lustre, are still regarded as being more dire than their brighter counterparts, just as they would have been regarded during the time that Beowulf strives to capture.
Putting these three things together also establishes Grendel, the subject of this line, as being utterly separate from god. To the Anglo-Saxons, god was a concept of light and intricate patterns (both things negated by such darkness). That his utterance implies an understanding of this association also marks Beowulf as a rather smooth talker, one who can turn a memorable phrase as well as parry and riposte a well timed strike.
Back To Top
Beowulf and cover letter writing
Speaking of Beowulf as well-spoken. This section of his speech to the coastguard fits very nicely into a rhetorical outline of his speech as a whole.
The previous section of his speech was all about his introduction. That section established who Beowulf is as a person and where he stands in relation to the hierarchy of power. That is, he's related to Ecgtheow, who had helped the Danes previously, he's in the service of Hygelac, a famed warrior, and has accomplished deeds of renown in the past.
This week's section has him move from that self-introduction to an explanation of why he (and his crew) have come to Daneland. Although the coastguard would already be well-versed in the troubles of his people, Beowulf's stating the problem (before running through his ability to solve it next week), establishes that he is familiar with said problem. Thus, Beowulf offers the coastguard a view onto his own understanding of what it is he is here to help with.
Rhetorically speaking, this sort of complete introductory speech is still used today.
Unless I've been doing it wrong this whole time, the classic cover letter follows a relatively similar format. You introduce yourself, state the purpose of your application, and then why you're a good fit for the job to which you're applying. The biggest difference between this staple of serious job applications and Beowulf's speech is that instead of explicitly describing the job you're applying for, you implicitly do so in the skills and experiences that you emphasize in your cover letter.
Boasts are also sometimes a shared feature between Anglo-Saxon discourse and cover letter writing. But we won't see any of those in Beowulf until this coming week's extract.
Back To Top
Closing
Check back here on Thursday for the third part of Beowulf's introductory speech. In it he claims to be able to solve all the Danes' problems.
Back To Top
Thursday, February 6, 2014
What's found in Beowulf's word hoard (ll.258-269) [Old English]
Abstract
Translation
Recordings
Beowulf's credentials
Words from the hoard
Closing
Back To Top
Abstract
Beowulf unlocks his word hoard, and begins to answer the coastguard's concerns.
Back To Top
Translation
"The eldest answered him,
with the wisdom of the band, unlocked his word hoard:
'We are kin of the Geatish people
and of Hygelac's **hearth retainers;
His people knew my father,
a noble progenitor known as Ecgtheow, -
he commanded many winters, before he went on his way,
full of years; each man of counsel
on the wide earth takes heed of him.
We through care of the worries of your lord,
son of Halfdane, have come seeking,
the protector of your people; your exhortation to us is great!'"
(Beowulf ll.258-269)
Back To Top
Recordings
Old English:
{Forthcoming}
Modern English:
{Forthcoming}
Back To Top
Beowulf's credentials
Being the main character's first speech, this extract is surprisingly straightforward.
We get the poet introducing the speaker with a description of him and his answer rather than a name. We hear Beowulf tell the guard who they are, who they serve, who he is, and who his father is.
Hold on a second.
It's standard in old heroic stories that people introduce themselves with mentions of their connections. But placing the fealty connection so close to the blood connection creates a parallel that carries some weight.
In defining who they are, Beowulf says that they are "Hygelac's hearth retainers." In defining who he is, he says that Ecgtheow is his father. But, no doubt with a characteristic wry smile, the poet has for more than ten lines ignored the guard's admonishment from last week's extract: "haste is best
in saying why you are come hence'" ("Ofost is selest/to gecyðanne hwanan eowre cyme syndon" (ll.256-57)).
So why spend so many lines introducing himself so indirectly? In part because of tradition. But also, I think, because the credentials that Beowulf lays down are of the utmost importance.
Hygelac is a great war leader from what little we've learned of him so far. And, from what Beowulf says, his father is a famed tactician. Along with wanting to show the guard just what he's all about, I think Beowulf mentions these two men in the way that he does to communicate that he combines these qualities. Qualities that until now have appeared separately in all of those who have come to face Grendel.
The combination of a warrior's spirit and a commander's mind (also, a commander who survived for a long time, suggesting, in one way, that Ecgtheow was able to delay death itself) would surely be seen as what was needed to destroy Grendel.
What, then, can be said for the order of Beowulf's laying down his credentials? Why not put his father first and his people second?
I think it's a move meant to show humility, that Beowulf is not out to serve himself, but instead in the service of a whole people.
Again, much like the reference to a warrior like Hygelac, I believe this is meant to show Beowulf's courage or strength of heart. What he fights for is not personal gain, but the benefit of whole groups of people. That makes him the perfect candidate for defeating Grendel, since he has the moral high ground against a monster that the poet has called kin of Cain, a lineage that marks him with grand immorality.
At least, as far as kinship ties go. If Beowulf's ties bring in longevity, battle strength, and cunning, Grendel's brings in murderousness, gluttony, and rage.
Back To Top
Words from the hoard
Some wondrous words are used in this passage.
"Yldest" (l.257) is usually fairly straightforward. It simply means "oldest," or "chief." In the context in which it appears here, this latter definition makes fine sense. And the probe into this word's meaning could end there.
But if it's taken to mean the "oldest," then just how young are Beowulf's companions?
As he is the hero of the story, it's easy to see Beowulf as a young man who stands on an established reputation for prowess. But being reminded of the rest of his band like this makes that perception shaky. Especially if this trip is a means for Beowulf to come of age and prove his worth. Such a test seems tailored to someone in his teens. Does that mean that his companions are hardly able to grow beards? Or is the age difference just a matter of months?
Interpreting the word as "chief" is clearer, but why have a word that could mean either "oldest" or "chief"?
This dual definition implies a connection between the two, certainly.
And why not? seniority and authority often go together quite well, especially in medieval societies. Still, the connection one way makes me wonder if it could go the other way as well. If Beowulf is the oldest he can be the chief, but if he is the chief does that mean that he is, necessarily, the oldest?
Another curious compound appears in this passage, too. It's the word translated as "hearth retainers" in line 261 above: "heorð-geneatas," a combination of "heorð" (meaning "hearth") and "neat" (meaning "companion, follower (esp. in war); dependent, vassal; tenant who works for a lord"). Because of the range of options for "geneatas," the meaning of this one is difficult to bring out in Modern English.
Much like "hall hero", I think that "hearth retainers" is a solid translation. This new compound gets across that those meant are close to the one they serve and that their master has given them job security of some sort - keeping them on retainer.
Back To Top
Closing
Next week, Beowulf continues to speak. Come on by this blog on Thursday to listen!
Back To Top
Translation
Recordings
Beowulf's credentials
Words from the hoard
Closing
Back To Top
Abstract
Beowulf unlocks his word hoard, and begins to answer the coastguard's concerns.
Back To Top
Translation
"The eldest answered him,
with the wisdom of the band, unlocked his word hoard:
'We are kin of the Geatish people
and of Hygelac's **hearth retainers;
His people knew my father,
a noble progenitor known as Ecgtheow, -
he commanded many winters, before he went on his way,
full of years; each man of counsel
on the wide earth takes heed of him.
We through care of the worries of your lord,
son of Halfdane, have come seeking,
the protector of your people; your exhortation to us is great!'"
(Beowulf ll.258-269)
Back To Top
Recordings
Old English:
{Forthcoming}
Modern English:
{Forthcoming}
Back To Top
Beowulf's credentials
Being the main character's first speech, this extract is surprisingly straightforward.
We get the poet introducing the speaker with a description of him and his answer rather than a name. We hear Beowulf tell the guard who they are, who they serve, who he is, and who his father is.
Hold on a second.
It's standard in old heroic stories that people introduce themselves with mentions of their connections. But placing the fealty connection so close to the blood connection creates a parallel that carries some weight.
In defining who they are, Beowulf says that they are "Hygelac's hearth retainers." In defining who he is, he says that Ecgtheow is his father. But, no doubt with a characteristic wry smile, the poet has for more than ten lines ignored the guard's admonishment from last week's extract: "haste is best
in saying why you are come hence'" ("Ofost is selest/to gecyðanne hwanan eowre cyme syndon" (ll.256-57)).
So why spend so many lines introducing himself so indirectly? In part because of tradition. But also, I think, because the credentials that Beowulf lays down are of the utmost importance.
Hygelac is a great war leader from what little we've learned of him so far. And, from what Beowulf says, his father is a famed tactician. Along with wanting to show the guard just what he's all about, I think Beowulf mentions these two men in the way that he does to communicate that he combines these qualities. Qualities that until now have appeared separately in all of those who have come to face Grendel.
The combination of a warrior's spirit and a commander's mind (also, a commander who survived for a long time, suggesting, in one way, that Ecgtheow was able to delay death itself) would surely be seen as what was needed to destroy Grendel.
What, then, can be said for the order of Beowulf's laying down his credentials? Why not put his father first and his people second?
I think it's a move meant to show humility, that Beowulf is not out to serve himself, but instead in the service of a whole people.
Again, much like the reference to a warrior like Hygelac, I believe this is meant to show Beowulf's courage or strength of heart. What he fights for is not personal gain, but the benefit of whole groups of people. That makes him the perfect candidate for defeating Grendel, since he has the moral high ground against a monster that the poet has called kin of Cain, a lineage that marks him with grand immorality.
At least, as far as kinship ties go. If Beowulf's ties bring in longevity, battle strength, and cunning, Grendel's brings in murderousness, gluttony, and rage.
Back To Top
Words from the hoard
Some wondrous words are used in this passage.
"Yldest" (l.257) is usually fairly straightforward. It simply means "oldest," or "chief." In the context in which it appears here, this latter definition makes fine sense. And the probe into this word's meaning could end there.
But if it's taken to mean the "oldest," then just how young are Beowulf's companions?
As he is the hero of the story, it's easy to see Beowulf as a young man who stands on an established reputation for prowess. But being reminded of the rest of his band like this makes that perception shaky. Especially if this trip is a means for Beowulf to come of age and prove his worth. Such a test seems tailored to someone in his teens. Does that mean that his companions are hardly able to grow beards? Or is the age difference just a matter of months?
Interpreting the word as "chief" is clearer, but why have a word that could mean either "oldest" or "chief"?
This dual definition implies a connection between the two, certainly.
And why not? seniority and authority often go together quite well, especially in medieval societies. Still, the connection one way makes me wonder if it could go the other way as well. If Beowulf is the oldest he can be the chief, but if he is the chief does that mean that he is, necessarily, the oldest?
Another curious compound appears in this passage, too. It's the word translated as "hearth retainers" in line 261 above: "heorð-geneatas," a combination of "heorð" (meaning "hearth") and "neat" (meaning "companion, follower (esp. in war); dependent, vassal; tenant who works for a lord"). Because of the range of options for "geneatas," the meaning of this one is difficult to bring out in Modern English.
Much like "hall hero", I think that "hearth retainers" is a solid translation. This new compound gets across that those meant are close to the one they serve and that their master has given them job security of some sort - keeping them on retainer.
Back To Top
Closing
Next week, Beowulf continues to speak. Come on by this blog on Thursday to listen!
Back To Top
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)